Critical thinking is so over rated.  Get with the times people, it's the 2020's where critical thinking is only for a fringe minority labeled by the government and media as conspiracy theorists and grandma killing terrorists.  Politicians swapped out, "critical thinking", for "critical doing", a long time ago.  Nancy Pelosi first made critical doing trendy in 2010 when she famously said this about the Obama health care bill, "but we have to pass the bill so you can find out what's in it".  Being incapable of critical thinking or a "trans thinker", is considered a top quality for good governance. 

The de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors are making sure to be equitably stupid about their short-term rental moratorium in unincorporated Mono County.  Instead of using critical thinking to do a cost-benefit analysis of imposing a short-term rental moratorium they are taking the politically correct course of action.  There is a workforce housing crisis after all, so they claim.  There is no time for critical thinking, only critical doing.  They admittedly have no idea what the impacts and consequences of the short-term rental moratorium will be.  They doubled down on their critical doing by making sure they have no study or funding for a study that could determine what if any results a short-term rental moratorium would have.  Act now think later.  As the de facto Mono County Supervisor Rhonda Duggan and Director of Community Development Wendy Sugimura brilliantly pointed out, "22 months is not long at all". 

Board member John Peters must have toned down his consumption of aspartame sweetened chewing gum and diet coke because he broke protocol and started thinking.  Mr. Peters questioned the reasoning of the short-term rental moratorium in unincorporated Mono County because it conflicts with the current system they already have in place to address short-term rentals.  [Video below]

In another act of shortsightedness, the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors postponed the decision to terminate the local emergencies for the Mountain View Fire.  About 19 months ago they declared a local emergency and a local health emergency for the Mountain View Fire. Signed, sealed, and undelivered.  They signed off on the agenda item to terminate the local emergencies, sealed their criminal negligence, and did not deliver.  After 19 months, in what were supposed to be the final moments for these two emergencies, they had an epiphany.  Does terminating the local emergencies disqualify transportation and CHP escort fee waivers?  What happens to the 5 properties left that have not been cleaned up?  Where we gonna get more money?  They need more time to think about it, cause a year and a half is not ample enough when you don't use critical thinking. 

Operations Section Chief, Louis Molina recommended that the BOS terminate the local emergencies for the Mountain View Fire.  Mr. Molina said, "With the remaining properties that still need some cleanup, that doesn't really justify keeping the emergencies open".  The BOS disregarded direction from their own staff to terminate the local emergencies.  Not because of the 5 properties remaining that have not been cleaned up or because of possible toxic soils or because of remaining emergency conditions.  They continued the emergencies once again, for the sole reason that they wanted to remain eligible for funding by the state.  According to the California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 101080, the law that describes what the conditions of an emergency are and when to terminate a local emergency, "remaining eligible for funding" is not a condition of emergency.  There are no conditions described anywhere in the law that recognizes a lack of funding, desire for funding, or who's gonna pay for that as an emergency.  HSC § 101080 makes it clear that the BOS are required, BY THEIR OWN LAW, to proclaim the termination of the local emergencies at the EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE THAT CONDITIONS WARRANT THE TERMINATION!  Mr. Molina said the conditions no longer justify keeping the emergencies open but the BOS broke the law. Again.  Even against  the direction from their own staff. 

In a followup phone call to Mr. Molina, he admitted that every other property that burned in the Mountain View Fire had been cleaned up over 6 months ago.  Yet, at the June 14 BOS meeting, he claimed the 5 properties that have not been cleaned up don't really justify keeping the emergencies going. However, that has been the case for over six months now! They are all in on the fraud.  There is no local emergency or local health emergency occurring due to the Mountain View Fire.  Speaking of the local health emergency.. where was the health department on this?  You would think that the health officer and or director would chime in on this health EMERGENCY.  How about give everyone some details as to why now, a year and seven months later, the health conditions for the emergency you declared, no longer exist. [video below]

There was also no Covid-19 update at the June 14 BOS meeting.  I guess the local health emergency for Covid-19 took the week off.  Maybe it was just a really uneventful emergency this week.  So uneventful that It almost kind of felt like there was no emergency happening due to Covid-19.  It kinda, sorta felt like the conditions of emergency did not exist or something.  Let's not think about that though, it hurts to much to think.

Don't forget to vote and I voted are the go to slogans commonly used by the plebians who pretend to give a shit on election days.  Let's be honest though, apart from filling in some bubbles next to names on a sheet of paper once every couple years or so do people actually care?  If you asked your friends and neighbors to name people on their Town Council or County Board of Supervisors what would they say?  Most likely you would invoke a blank slated face and the sound of crickets would suddenly fill the awkward situation you put your friend or neighbor in by asking such a ridiculous question.  Nobody knows, nobody cares apart from election days.  Even then, most people don't vote anymore.  So long as the bread and circus continues and the United States Inc. can maintain the unsustainable standard of living enjoyed by blissfully ignorant American plebians, the nobody cares mantra will remain the norm.  For the average person, their concept of voting means having someone else deal with all the problems.  Yet, despite the obvious, that there are more problems than ever before... people still seem to think government solves problems when the exact opposite is the truth.  All government does is create problems.   You see, a government that solves problems is like a pharmaceutical company curing a disease.. It simply does not happen because it would be bad for business.  Sure, a pharmaceutical company might create a product that lessens the symptoms of one ailment but not without creating a whole slew of new health side effects.  The same is true of government.  Pretend to solve one problem that creates more problems so they can justify their existence.  More problems, more crises, more emergencies is good business for government.  Granted, most of the people in government are so incredibly stupid they don't realize they are the problem.  They consistently feed their indoctrination with regular ass slapping and proclamations of appreciation.  Ensuring to themselves that there could be no other possible reality.  Need I remind them, nobody knows and nobody cares?

The De Facto Mono County government is back to in-person meetings.  The in-person part which means not on a web cam is still optional.  Only 3 out of 5 board of supervisors opted to attend the meeting in person at the massive 33,000 square foot Mono County Civic Center.  Curious number that 33,000 square feet... Why not 30,000 or 31,000 or 32,422 or any other number for that matter?  I guess its no secret that a lot of these government gang members fancy themselves as part of some kind of superior class of "in the know" type societies.  The number 33 is often associated in far out conspiracy theories that involve masonic and satanic cult organizations.  There is also a biblical significance to many numbers including the number 33.  We are not going to go down that whole shabang in this article but it is something we can't ignore.  Especially when you take into consideration that Mono County Inc. spent $20.5 million dollars to build the 33,000 square foot civic center.  What! $20.5 million dollars? Yeah, you read that right.  They made it extra nice for all the plebians clamoring to take part in government meetings!  Except there were no plebs clamoring to get into the civic center to attend the board meeting on June 7.  The only people at the government meeting were people in the government, as is par for the course. In fact, almost nobody who does not work in or for the local de facto government even knows there is a civic center in Mammoth Lakes.  Most locals have no clue that their taxes funded a $20.5 million dollar civic center so lifelong parasites such as Bob Gardner, Bob Lawton, Ingrid Braun, and Stacey Simon could feed their narcissistic delusions of self worth.  News flash government scum!  Nobody knows, nobody cares!  Until they do... and when the plebs are forced to start caring you will finally get your audience clamoring to get into the civic center.  Unfortunately for you, they won't be there to give applause and pat you on the back in recognition of all your great accomplishments like your fellow gang members routinely do. 

I for one will miss the zoom meetings.  Those zoom boxes that oh so fittingly resemble prison cells containing the mad men and mad women who fancy themselves as leaders.  Their new normal of Zoom prison cells are being swapped out for a 33,000 square foot government echo chamber.  The perfect place where they can seal their mental illness of grandiosity.

A letter by William Wallace:

My voice was silenced in violation of the first amendment and Brown Act by Mono County government officials (county administrative office, board of supervisors).  I suppose their explanation for why they chose to not publish my comment might have a tiny amount of justification in a large county with a massive agenda and substantial amounts of public participation in the local government process.  However, that is not the case in Mono County.  I am just one of a handful of people in the public who have put in time and effort to participate in the local government process.  Apparently, the Mono County BOS and their appointed officials idea of good governance is to silence the views of the very few people who actually participate.

What did they silence and why?  I sent an email message to the BOS and requested it be added as correspondence.  The message was in regard to the possible moratorium on short-term rentals for unincorporated Mono County.  I pointed out that there are serious conflicts of interests involved with the BOS discussing legislating a short-term rental moratorium.  Recently, the Mono County government implemented a new policy for public correspondence.  In their words;

"Thank you for your email. Per County Administrative Officer direction and policy, written correspondence directed to the Board of Supervisors and not related to an upcoming agenda item will no longer be published on the agenda unless an individual Board member requests such publication."

Sure, as I said earlier, that might have a smidgen of credence if their agenda was extensive and they were inundated with messages from the public but that is not the case.  Instead it sends the message that input from the public is not valued in the least, or just completely unwanted.  I am sure they would have had no problem adding my correspondence if it was something they approved of.  

Let me further address their response quoted above.  What a slippery slope of an excuse it is to not publish public correspondence, whether or not they have a relevant agenda item.  Why?  Well at the start of every meeting the public has an opportunity to address the board about items not on the days agenda.  So, really, all they are saying is they want to pick and choose when and what the public can add to government meetings.  This policy is egregious to the first amendment.  Furthermore, from my extensive efforts sharing input in the local government process, I have found that it is mostly an exercise in futility to change the minds of the governing body.  Sadly, mob rule democracy has snuffed out the voices which are supposed to embody a Republic.  With the exception that a minority's viewpoint or ideology aligns with the agenda of the government. My messages are not directed entirely with the sole purpose of communicating to the BOS or local government.  That is just the process one must take in order to get a message made public record.  What's far more important to me is getting my messages seen and or heard by other members of the public.

That brings me to the Brown Act violation.  Their excuse to not publish my correspondence does not supersede one's broad constitutional rights while participating in government meetings as described in the Brown Act.  Even if they did have a leg to stand on by censoring my message, don't you find it rather childish to not publish my message?  Maybe better described as petty, pathetic and tyrannical?  Why did they implement such a policy?  Like I said, it's not as if they have an overwhelming amount of messages coming in.  To me, it is a clear violation of the Brown Act, which I have conveyed to the District Attorney.  That makes three Brown Act violations by Mono County government officials since I started participating in the local government process a couple years ago.  The District Attorney, Tim Kendall, ignores everything I send to him because he can or because he doesn't have any good defense for the actions of his colleagues. Or maybe he is just a low life scumbag government gangbanger? Brown Act violations are the responsibility of the District Attorney's office.

What are the conflicts of interests that the Mono County Board of Supervisors have with imposing a short-term rental moratorium? 

In a general sense, which applies to all 5 supervisors, one conflict of interest is the financial impacts caused by a short-term rental moratorium.  A large percentage of real estate buyers in Mono County purchase property for use as a rental property.  Another significant number of buyers purchase property as a vacation home, knowing they can offset their costs by renting short-term.  Both of these buyer demographics would be substantially reduced if not eliminated altogether from the housing market which strongly hurts demand.  Less demand for real estate equates to lower property values.  This would hurt any new sellers under the short-term rental moratorium.  Given that the BOS can start or end the moratorium whenever they see fit puts them in a position where they can potentially benefit from the reduction in buyer demand and lower property values.  Nothing prevents them from buying property as an individual at a lower-than-market value from their direct involvement in imposing a short-term rental moratorium.  They could buy a property and then lift the moratorium and resell the property at a higher price once the demand from investors returned.  Or they could get a smokin deal on a property and do short-term rentals down the road.  This conflict of interest not only applies to the Board of Supervisors as individuals but also to the county as it's own entity.  They are claiming they need to impose the short-term rental moratorium to combat what they deem a workforce housing crisis.  The same financial conflict of interest of reducing buyer demand, consequently lowering property values, applies to Mono County Inc.  Assuming Mono County Inc. decided to purchase property at a lower-than-market value in an effort to create more workforce housing.  Whether or not they intend to act on this does not absolve the conflict of interest.

Other conflicts of interests that are more individual specific apply to district 1 supervisor Jennifer Kreitz.  The Conflict of Interest Act applies to any board of supervisor that is also on another regulatory board with decision making authority.  Regardless if that position is salaried or unsalaried.  Jennifer Kreitz is currently Vice President on the board of directors at Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc.  A board position which gives her decision making authority for that organization to purchase property within the county.  Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc. has a stated goal to increase affordable and workforce housing.  This organization would also potentially benefit financially from the buyer demand destruction a short-term rental moratorium would create. 

On another note, the current chair of the BOS Bob Gardner and BOS Stacy Corless both have ties with Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc.  Even though they are not currently participating in that organization, their decision to impose a short-term rental moratorium is a potential financial and material benefit for MLH Inc. which is a conflict of interest.  A short-term rental moratorium could eventually benefit them financially if they decided to return to work for Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc. as a paid employee.  The more successful Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc. is, the more paid position opportunities they can offer. At the very least the current paid positions could become more lucrative.  Jennifer Kreitz, Bob Gardner, and Stacy Corless all have ties with Mammoth Lakes Housing Inc. 


District 5 BOS Stacy Corless also has additional conflicts of interest.  She has a vested interest in lodging operations in Mono County which would benefit financially from a short-term rental moratorium.  Less options for short-term rentals in unincorporated Mono County will drive more people to hotels, motels and Mammoth Mountain rentals.  Another layer to Stacy's conflicts of interest include her spouse, Ron Cohen who is the COO and president of Mammoth Mountain.  A short-term rental moratorium in unincorporated Mono County would impact individual property owners and stifle new competition benefiting these larger established lodging operations.  In 2020, Stacy Corless was in favor of enforcing the ban on short-term rentals and closing non-essential businesses.  That policy ended up costing property owners who relied on short-term rental income dearly, as well as all the property management companies and the workforce that maintains those properties.  However, Mammoth Mountain's lodging operations, while they took a financial haircut, still profited and benefited from the diminished competition caused by the short-term rental ban.

Under the Conflicts of Interest Act, a legislative body such as the Town Council of Mammoth Lakes or the Mono County Board of Supervisors are prohibited to vote on policy decisions when a conflict of interest exists.

Many people in the community and the country viewed the 2020 ban on short-term rentals as a violation of the 5th and 14th amendments.  Under the 14th amendment federal and state authorities have the power of eminent domain, the ability for government to take private property for public use—provided that they offer “just compensation” in exchange.  The 14th amendment also states, "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." 

In 2020, The Town Council of Mammoth Lakes and the Mono County Board of Supervisors supported a ban on short-term rentals.   They had no evidence to support their claim that banning short-term rentals would prevent the spread of Covid-19.  They went ahead with the short-term rental ban anyway and did so without giving due process to those affected.  Instead of offering "just compensation", the government levied the loss of income onto the property owners that did short-term rentals.  Consequently all the property management companies and their employees were also burdened with substantial financial losses due to government imposed regulations. 

When the government banned short-term rentals but allowed for hotels, motels, restaurants, and Mammoth Mountain to continue to do business, albeit limited business, they violated the 14th amendments requirement of equal protection of the laws.   

The 2020 short-term rental ban was a government imposed regulation which deprived people of life, liberty and property.  The short-term rental ban and forced closure of businesses that were deemed non-essential was a temporary form of eminent domain and a per se takings by government regulations. 

There is widespread litigation on this issue throughout the country including right here in Mono County.  Members of the Town Council of Mammoth Lakes, the Mono County Board of Supervisors, and others are already facing litigation for their previous involvement with the policy decision to ban short-term rentals in 2020.  Yet, despite being in litigation over a similar issue, the Mono County BOS is discussing a short-term rental moratorium in unincorporated Mono County! 

This is a great example of why a taxpayer funded legal counsel for the government should not exist.  Government officials have no disincentive for criminal actions that create a situation ripe for litigation wherein they use taxpayer dollars to defend against.  Why should taxpayers fund the legal defense for criminal actions made by government?  It's despicable.  A recent ruling made by the 8th circuit court of appeals about the state of Minnesota's eviction moratorium was ruled as a per se takings requiring just compensation.  The Minnesota taxpayer funded the legal defense for the state and the state lost.  Now the taxpayer has to pay for the governments criminal actions by repaying themselves for the states violations of the 14th amendment!  Of course the government will most likely raise taxes on the people as a result of their having to provide just compensation for their regulatory takings, which begs the question. Can the taxpayer sue the government for their criminal actions that caused an increase to their tax burden?  Talk about a doom loop of self destructive government policies which bites off the hands that feed them.

The demand destruction caused by a short-term rental moratorium would directly impact any property owner looking to sell under this government imposed regulation.  The decrease in property value sellers would be faced with is another form of regulatory takings by government.  Seller's should seek due process and just compensation as required by the 14th amendment if they decide to sell at a loss. 

I want to expand on the reason why Mono County Inc. is considering a short-term rental moratorium in the first place.  They claim that there is a workforce housing crisis caused by a lack of long-term rentals and affordable housing in the county.  At the BOS meeting on May 3 a member of the public who has supposedly lived in Mono County since the 1970's, mentioned there has always been a so called workforce housing crisis.  I'm mentioning this because I found that statement to be very telling that the supposed workforce housing issue is being grossly exaggerated by the current county regime.  According to this long time resident, there has always been a workforce and affordable housing crisis in Mono County and the Town of Mammoth Lakes.  Yet the Town of Mammoth Lakes and Mono County have managed just fine.  This is not the first time the county has tried a short-term rental moratorium to address what they perceive to be a workforce housing crisis.  Apparently, they did it before and the problem still exists... so why do they expect it to work this time? 

Something else I feel should be discussed about the county deemed crisis of workforce and affordable housing.  The county is trying to micro manage a macro economic problem.  The BOS seem to be under the impression that this is a local problem that only resort type towns and counties are faced with.  I grew up in Ventura, CA and I can say for certain that the local government there makes the exact same claims about their jurisdiction.  I have never heard anyone describe Ventura as a resort destination but I do know for a fact that the local government there has been clamoring about workforce and affordable housing for decades.  Throughout my years in Ventura I saw government sponsored "affordable housing" tracts get developed.  The affordable housing had all kinds of strings attached to prevent certain demographics from buying.  Income restrictions and rental restrictions being the most glaring of the strings attached.  What ended up happening long term is an interesting story which demonstrates that government interfering in free markets to solve what they see as a problem always creates more problems.  While the government was successful in creating affordable housing through regulations it was not consequence free.  One consequence was the people who bought the affordable housing ended up with substantially lower property values compared to unregulated housing developments.  The low income families who bought these properties ended up with 30-50% lower property values compared to other houses with similar lot sizes and square footage.  The government regulations helped lower income people find housing at the cost of a massive loss in long term equity.  Making it much more difficult for lower income families to climb the economic ladder.

Why are property values so sky high?  Is it because of the "free market"?  Absolutely not.  The "free market" does not exist.  Real estate is sky high because of government intervention.  Since the financial crisis of 2008, loose monetary policies from government intervention allowed for rock bottom interest rates on mortgages.  Ultra low interest rates created cheap money encouraging people who know the game to take on massive debt to invest in real estate.  As a result of the government created loose monetary policy and ultra low interest rates the price of housing has gone through the roof.  The big investors who knew how to take advantage of  the loose government monetary policies have created an artificial workforce and affordable housing problem.  The government turned what was a small problem of affordable housing into a large problem.  Now the local government Mono County Inc. and the shills that work for Mammoth Lakes Housing are trying to solve a problem that state and federal monetary policies created.   

The cure for short-term rentals is more short-term rentals.  The Housing Authority should be giving away short-term rental applications to anyone who wants them.  Flooding the town and county with short-term rentals and airbnb's etc is the best way to create more long term rentals.  The more people who offer short-term rentals the more competition.   This will drive the prices down for short-term rentals which will in turn motivate people to switch over to long-term rentals eventually easing the strain on available workforce housing.  That is really the only productive way to address the issue caused by government intervention.  

The breakdown in this letter was an elaboration of the message I tried to get to the public in my correspondence letter to the Mono County Board of Supervisors.  They did not want the public to see it on the agenda so I am writing this article instead.  All they had to do was make my message public as I requested.  Instead, they demonstrated a disturbing lack of ethics and stifled my speech as a dissenting voice of government policy.  Whether or not you agree with a ban on short-term rentals or any of my views in this article, we should all agree that government imposed censorship is wrong. 

Please contact the Mono County Administrative Officer Bob Lawton, and the Mono County BOS and let them know they are wrong to censor public correspondence for any reason whatsoever.  Please contact the District Attorney Tim Kendall's office and ask him to do his job for once and officially reprimand those involved with first amendment and Brown Act violations.

Sincerely,
William Wallace

When most people think of gangs they usually do not associate the term with governments.  Typically, the word "gang", is associated with street gangs, motorcycle gangs, terrorists etc.  However, if one does a little research into how a gang is defined, they will realize that government as an organization is indeed a gang.  Let's take a look at how gangs are defined by the National Institute of Justice. [The National Institute of Justice is the research, development and evaluation agency of the U.S. Department of Justice.]

What is a gang?
Federal definition. The federal definition of gang as used by the Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security's Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), is [1]:

1. An association of three or more individuals;
2. Whose members collectively identify themselves by adopting a group identity, which they use to create an atmosphere of fear or intimidation, frequently by employing one or more of the following: a common name, slogan, identifying sign, symbol, tattoo or other physical marking, style or color of clothing, hairstyle, hand sign or graffiti;
3. Whose purpose in part is to engage in criminal activity and which uses violence or intimidation to further its criminal objectives.
4. Whose members engage in criminal activity or acts of juvenile delinquency that if committed by an adult would be crimes with the intent to enhance or preserve the association's power, reputation or economic resources.
5. The association may also possess some of the following characteristics:
   1. The members may employ rules for joining and operating within the association.
   2. The members may meet on a recurring basis.
   3. The association may provide physical protection of its members from others.
   4. The association may seek to exercise control over a particular geographic location or region, or it may simply defend its perceived interests against rivals.
   5. The association may have an identifiable structure.

Does the National Institute of Justice's definition of gang apply to the de facto Mono County government?

1. An association of three or more individuals. Check!

2. The members collectively identify themselves as a group and have a logo to represent their gang.  Check!

3. Whose purpose in part is to engage in criminal activity which uses violence or intimidation to further its criminal objectives. Check! 

4. Whose members engage in criminal activity with the intent to enhance or preserve the association's power, reputation or economic resources.  Check!

5.The association may also possess some of the following characteristics:

1. The members may employ rules for joining and operating within the association. Check!
2. The members may meet on a recurring basis. Check!
3. The association may provide physical protection of its members from others. Check!
4. The association may seek to exercise control over a particular geographic location or region, or it may simply defend its perceived interests against rivals. Check!
5. The association may have an identifiable structure. Check!

Some of you might disagree with parts of the definition of gang as it applies to governments.  Maybe you think parts 3 and 4 of the definition are not true. Would you argue against the notion that governments do not have a group identity used to create an atmosphere of fear and intimidation?

For those of you who own property, do you not feel pressure to pay your property taxes?  Why do you feel pressure to pay your taxes?  Perhaps you feel fear and intimidation from the consequences of not paying your taxes to the gang of government? 

Do you truly believe that government gangs do not engage in criminal activity with the intent to enhance or preserve their power, reputation, or economic resources?  If so, you must not have read the other articles on this page which establish that Mono County Inc. routinely breaks the law to gain economic resources.  Economic resources are vital to a government gangs power. 

On May 8 2020, Mono County Inc. instated a measure that insinuated everyone must wear a mask before entering an indoor space.  The gang of government referred to this measure as a mandate ordered by the local health director.  The health authorities, by intimidation, threat, and coercion, made every store owner, business, and establishment put signs in their windows that read, "YOU MUST WEAR A MASK TO ENTER THIS ESTABLISHMENT".

That is just one example of the signs displaying messages that gave the impression there was no other option but to wear a mask.  These large signs and posters were not the only ones that the health department ordered businesses to put in their stores.  The health department also required businesses to post health orders which were a much smaller standard 8 x 11 size sheet of paper.  On the initial health orders, there were a couple small sections explaining that there were exemptions for wearing a mask.  One exemption was for health reasons, another one was for religious reasons and another one was for children age 2 and under.

There were always numerous, large, colored signs posted at storefront entrances, which emphasized one MUST wear a mask to enter an establishment.  However, on the other hand, the exemptions for wearing a mask were on a standard 8x11 piece of paper with a wall of text that was hard to read. To make matters even worse, new orders issued by the health department no longer included the exemptions at all.  Within a few months the health and religious exemptions were all but lost as the mask psychosis took hold on the minds of the masses.
 
Few people were able to withstand the onslaught of fear and propaganda churned out by the media and government.  Nearly everyone was wearing a mask and doing as they were told.  After a couple months of the masses wearing masks, even the thought of a mask exemption became inconceivable to them.  The messages and images emphasizing that one was required to wear a mask had become ingrained into their way of life.  So much so that it became commonplace to see people wearing masks even when there was no order to do so.  Hordes of people were wearing masks while driving alone in their cars, walking down the street, riding a bike, or hiking miles out in the woods.  The passion for mask wearing was strong beyond belief, further isolating the few who dared show an uncovered face.  Society degenerated rapidly as mask passion developed into mask fervor.  The gang of government's one sided emphasis for wearing a mask successfully radicalized a segment of the population, instilling hatred for a minority of people who did not wear masks.  The minority group of non-mask wearing individuals were often a protected class under state and federal anti-discrimination laws. 

Through an unwavering campaign by the gang of government they created a proxy hate group of mask Neo-Nazi's. These mask fanatics, empowered by the government gang, used intimidation, coercion, threats of violence and violence to enforce the mask measure. The government radicalized part of the population to further their criminal objectives under color of law!

Despite laborious efforts to get the de facto Mono County government to recognize their criminal policies, they made no effort to resolve the grievances of the few.  Simple requests such as emphasizing health and religious exemptions to prevent discrimination and violence fell on deaf ears.  Information, data, statistics and facts not in line with their malevolent agenda were disregarded.  Even when the information was from their own sources.  Sources such as the, California Department of Public Health, American Public Health Institution, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Disease Control and the World Health Organization.  The government gang only cared about enhancing and preserving the association's newfound powers.  Powers they exercised with complete disregard for the law.

Even when reports of discrimination and violence against non mask wearers were brought to the attention of the District Attorney's office they did nothing.  In the state of California, one of the jobs of the District Attorney is to prosecute criminal and civil cases.  As an example, criminal and civil issues that fall under the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act.  District Attorneys are afforded wide discretion in what they choose to prosecute.  However, District Attorney Tim Kendall's blind eye when it came to the civil and criminal actions of people radicalized by government policies is a crime of its own.  His willingness to look the other way on his fellow gang member's criminal policies was only one part of the problem.  He also obstructed justice by not pursuing due process for those on both sides of the issues. 

According to the webpage of the District Attorney's office;

• Vindicate the rights of crime victims, witnesses, and persons accused of crime;
• Seek and achieve impartial justice;
• Ensure that the guilty are punished and the innocent freed;
• Safeguard the rule of law; and
• Treat all persons involved in the criminal justice system with fairness, dignity and respect.

Did Tim Kendall vindicate the rights of crime victims of government policy induced criminal and civil actions? No!
Did Tim Kendall seek and achieve impartial justice? No!
Did Tim Kendall ensure that the guilty are punished and the innocent freed from tyranny? No!
Did Tim Kendall safeguard the rule of law? No!
Did Tim Kendall treat all persons involved in the criminals justice system with fairness, dignity and respect? Absolutely not!

This piece of shit, low life scumbag even has the audacity to claim, "One of my primary goals is to assure that you live in a safe community and that you have confidence that you and/or your family or children will never be a victim of crime."  Are you fucking kidding?  The de facto Mono County District Attorneys Office allowed for the discrimination and persecution of protected classes to take place for nearly two years!  What an absolute disgrace!  The Town Council of Mammoth Lakes and the Mono County Board of Supervisors (among others) policy decisions directly and indirectly violated the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act.  Through emergency declarations based on fraudulent claims.

Below is a video clip of a government sponsored proxy gang member hatefully discriminating against people for not wearing masks.  This gang member acted under color of law to interfere by threat, intimidation, and coercion with those exercising their rights secured by the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act, California Constitution, nature and God.  With the blessing from the gang of government! 

Well now, it turns out there were actually three emergency declarations for Mono County at the same time!  Who would have guessed?  Apparently, the winter storms that rolled through Mono County in December (13-29) prompted Sheriff Ingrid Braun to declare a local emergency due to severe winter snowstorms.  Sheriff Braun declared the emergency under California Government Code section 8630, claiming that these winter storms created a scenario in which, "by reason of their magnitude, are or are likely to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the county and require the combined assistance of other political subdivisions". 

Sheriff Braun declared the emergency for winter snowstorms on January 6th, 2022, 8 days after the last storm came through Mono County.  That means Braun did not declare the emergency because the storms were "likely" to be beyond the control of the services, personnel, equipment, and facilities of the county. As the last storm happened 8 days prior.  Which indicates that Ingrid Braun had evaluated the facts on the ground and deemed that the situation absolutely required combined assistance of other political subdivisions.  That there was in fact, an emergency!  Or did Braun make a false claim of an emergency? 


[CA Gov Code 8630 (b) Whenever a local emergency is proclaimed by an official designated by ordinance, the local emergency shall not remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the governing body.]

As required by California Government Code section 8630, on January 11th, 2022 the board of supervisors voted 5/5 on the resolution to ratify the local emergency for severe winter snowstorms.  That is the correct course of action assuming there is ample evidence to support the claim of an emergency.

[CA Gov Code 8630 (d) The governing body shall proclaim the termination of the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.]

Perhaps those of you reading this article remember those emergency conditions?  If so, please feel free to use the contact us form and give a detailed description of the emergency conditions as you might recall them.  Apart from Highway 395 being shut down for a few days, some road closures, some downed trees, and what everyone in town referred to as, "sick pow", there did not seem to be any emergency.  Maybe the multi-day highway shutdowns and road closures required the combined assistance of other political subdivisions? 


Regardless, the main focus here is the question of when exactly did the earliest possible date that conditions warrant terminating the local emergency occur? 

On March 8 2022, the De Facto Mono County Board of Supervisors voted 5/5 to terminate the local emergency due to severe winter snowstorms.  According to local government officials, there were 61 days that emergency conditions existed from the severe winter snowstorms in December.  Was March 8th really the earliest possible date that conditions warranted terminating the emergency for severe winter snowstorms? 

The Mammoth Mountain snowfall history shows January 2022 at 0 inches of snowfall and February 2022 at 7 inches of snowfall.  Yet, Sheriff Braun and the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors claimed emergency conditions for severe winter snowstorms existed from Jan 6th-March 8th.  How can emergency conditions for severe winter snowstorms exist for two months with almost no snow?  The obvious answer to that questions is they can not.

That makes three separate local emergencies in Mono County, simultaneous to boot, that are based on fraudulent claims of an emergency.  Can someone please show us where exactly in the law it says a criteria for an emergency condition is that you want money?  This is clearly a false claim of an emergency from both Sheriff Braun and the Board of Supervisors.  If not right from the start, than certainly by January 11th when they voted to ratify the emergency declaration. 


In the video clip below, Sheriff Braun admits that there was no damage from the winter storms.  Additionally, Braun mentions that the California Office of Emergency Services declined their request for Mono County to be added to the list of counties in governor Newsom's proclomation for winter storm recovery support.  Sheriff Braun states that the Office of Emergency Services declined to add them to the governors proclamation because, "we did not have anything to support it at the time".  The request to be added to the governors list of counties impacted by winter storms happened on January 11th.  If they did not have anything to support the claims of an emergency at the time, then they are required by law to terminate the emergency.  However, that is not what happened.  Instead they broke the law and kept the emergency declaration in place while attempting to get financial and material support. 

Do you think keeping a local emergency going solely for funding is the right thing to do?  Are there particular circumstances justifying such an act?  Is it legal?

Mono County Inc. is currently under two separate declarations of health emergency.  The one covered in this segment is for the Mountain View Fire, which burned down over 80 structures and claimed one life.  The Mountain View Fire started on Nov. 17th, 2020 at 12:15 p.m.  Somewhat ironically, absent the fires, the Mountain View Fire started on the exact same day in which just hours prior, the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors voted 5/5 to terminate a different already existing local emergency for severe wild fire that was declared on September 18th 2020 by Sheriff Ingrid Braun. Full containment of the Mountain View Fire was finalized on Dec. 11th, 2020. As of March 1st 2022 the emergency declaration for the Mountain View Fire remains in place.  That makes well over a year of an emergency for a fire that had a total burn lifetime of 24 days.  The argument Mono County Inc. has been using to continue the emergency is that the structures and materials burned in the fire created toxic debris, ash and soil.  For over a year and 3 months now the county has been in the process of remediation of hazardous material.

Alright, so what exactly is the problem with all that?  Well, you have to dig a little deeper to find where cleaning up hazardous material goes from what sounds like a good idea to something that is being exaggerated to continue an emergency declaration. 

The first thing one needs to consider here is that the de facto government has laws in place that address what constitutes an emergency.  The second thing people should take into consideration is that the law does not care about our feelings or what we believe is right or wrong.  A flawed system in many respects perhaps, but the law is designed to prevent crimes from occurring and describe the penalties when a crime is committed.  Whether committed by individuals, corporations, or governments, nothing is exempt from the law.  Or is it? 

Now to dig a littler deeper.  For months, almost all the hazardous material removal and remediation has been completed.  There are only a handful of properties left that have not completed the remediation process.  You read correctly, only a handful of properties... now I ask the reader, do you consider those circumstances to qualify as an emergency?  Regardless of yes or no, there are laws that describe exactly what constitutes an emergency, which we will take a closer look at shortly.

Let's see what the Mono County Inc. is saying about their reasons to continue the local emergency for a handful of properties:

"Continuation of the declared emergencies supports the County's eligibility for state disaster assistance while debris efforts
are still underway. Debris removal costs are eligible for reimbursement only when there is an immediate threat to public
health and safety".

Mono County Inc. is labeling a handful of properties still awaiting the remediation process, "an immediate threat to public health and safety".  Lets look up the definition of immediate.

Immediate - occurring, acting, or accomplished without loss or interval of time : instant

How much of an immediate threat to public health and safety are these properties really?  Enough to constitute an emergency? Let's take a look at how the law describes what qualifies as an emergency in regard to fire and hazardous material and when those qualifications expire.

The most relevant law for a local health emergency not under the California Emergency Services Act is California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 101080:

Whenever a release, spill, escape, or entry of waste occurs as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 101075 and the director or the local health officer reasonably determines that the waste is a hazardous waste or medical waste, or that it may become a hazardous waste or medical waste because of a combination or reaction with other substances or materials, and the director or local health officer reasonably determines that the release or escape is an immediate threat to the public health, or whenever there is an imminent and proximate threat of the introduction of any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease, chemical agent, noncommunicable biologic agent, toxin, or radioactive agent, the director may declare a health emergency and the local health officer may declare a local health emergency in the jurisdiction or any area thereof affected by the threat to the public health.  Whenever a local health emergency is declared by a local health officer pursuant to this section, the local health emergency shall not remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the board of supervisors, or city council, whichever is applicable to the jurisdiction.  The board of supervisors, or city council, if applicable, shall review, at least every 30 days until the local health emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local health emergency and shall proclaim the termination of the local health emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant the termination.

Here are some of the possible arguments that Mono County Inc. would use for their interpretation and use of this law;

[A fire burned down structures creating hazardous material.  The local health officer declared a health emergency due to the immediate threat the hazardous material posed to the public.  The immediacy of the emergency conditions persist until all hazardous materials have been removed with no deadline.  The emergency conditions that exist on the properties in Walker not cleared of hazardous materials remain an immediate threat to the entirety of Mono County.  The earliest possible date that conditions warrant to terminate the local health emergency have not manifested.]

Quite the stretch of an interpretation.  The definition of immediate is of particular importance here, immediate does not last long. Once the public was informed about the threat of hazardous material in the area and the public was blocked off from the area the threat was no longer immediate.  The immediate threat of the hazardous material had come and gone because people were made aware of the potential hazard.  Another flagrant violation of this law is that the threat to public health does not exist for anyone outside of the area affected by the fire.  Anyone outside of the Walker area is not in any danger from the hazardous material, yet the emergency encompasses the entirety of Mono County.  Furthermore, there are only a handful of properties left that have not completed the remediation process, therefore, there is little threat to public health even for those in the burn area.  The conditions for the need to continue the local health emergency no longer exist.  The eligible emergency conditions ceased to exist when the immediacy of the situation resided.  A situation that resided well over a year ago when the immediate threat to public health ended.

There is simply no emergency occurring due to the Mountain View Fire and the law clearly defines when the emergency declaration must be terminated.  There is only one reason to keep the emergency in place and Mono County Inc. officials admit to it.  They are keeping the emergency declaration in place to remain eligible for funding from state and federal agencies.  When a de facto official or governing body lies about an emergency and disaster to gain financially, according to their own laws, it is an act of fraud.  Committing fraud in this nature is a violation of California Penal Code 148.3 PC, a California statute that makes it a crime for a person to make a false report of an emergency.  Committing fraud in this manner is also a violation of 18 US Code 1040 which makes it a FELONY to perpetrate fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits.  Lastly, not terminating the local emergency for the Mountain View Fire at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant is a violation of Health and Safety Code 101080.

In the video clip below, Justin Nalder (solid waste superintendent) calls the efforts taking place in this fraudulent state of emergency, "recovery efforts". The words "recovery efforts", indicate the emergency has come and gone.  If there is still an immediate threat to public health from hazardous material as the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors states, why are people living in the area? 

What is an emergency?  Let's look up the word emergency and see how it is defined.

EMERGENCY
1 : an unforeseen combination of circumstances or the resulting state that calls for immediate action
2 : an urgent need for assistance or relief

Alright, so the word emergency is very clearly defined, not much room for interpretation here, unless you are the de facto government.  Let's breakdown the definition of emergency and apply this to the alleged health emergency for Covid-19.  The other health emergency declared by the de facto Mono County government.

Was Covid-19 an unforeseen combination of circumstances?  Depends on who you ask I suppose.  Covid-19 was first reported in the mainstream media on December 2019 which had watchful eyes on it months before the declaration of emergency in March 2020.  Okay then, ask yourself, when did the unforeseen combination of circumstances that defines what an emergency means go from unforeseen to seen? 

Technically, around three months of mainstream media coverage means Covid-19 was not unforeseen, but perhaps one could argue that the combination of circumstances caused by the alleged Covid-19 virus were unforeseen.  Although, since this is not the first alleged pandemic the world had experienced before, maybe the argument for unforeseen combination of circumstances is actually not applicable.  You be the judge. 

About three months after Covid-19 made its first appearance in the mainstream news, in March 2020, the US Inc., all 50 de facto state governments, and Mono County Inc., declared a state of emergency for Covid-19.  Once the declaration of emergency was declared the argument for an unforeseen combination of circumstances could no longer be used as it was now seen.

The second part of the definition of emergency was all that was left.  "A resulting state that calls for immediate action or an urgent need for assistance or relief".  We covered the definition of immediate in part one Mountain View Fire, but we will look at it again as well as the definition of urgent.  These words are in the definition of emergency for a reason.  These two words are crucial for understanding that an emergency is not something that persists.  

Immediate - occurring, acting, or accomplished without loss or interval of time : instant
URGENT - calling for immediate attention : pressing

Both urgent and immediate are words that indicate a low timeline threshold.  Something that is immediate or urgent does not last very long.  For example, your house is on fire, the need to put out the fire before it burns the house down is immediate and urgent.  Another example could be a heart attack or stroke.  These health issues are urgent by default and require immediate attention.  If any of these examples affected you or someone you know, would you call these a family emergency?  How long would you call it a family emergency?  Would you still call it an emergency in a present tense days or weeks after it happened?  Or would you refer to the emergency in past tense and consider it to be over once the event took place and was no longer immediate and urgent?

Alright, English lesson over.  Hopefully we are all on the same page now when it comes to the definition of emergency.

March 2020, a declaration of emergency was declared for Covid-19.  Two weeks to flatten the curve was the call for immediate action in the second part of the definition of emergency.  Once the immediate action, urgent assistance and relief took place, the definition of emergency had been used up.  There was no longer any immediacy or urgency to the situation as a whole. 

When you or a loved one are sick and have a health emergency, is that also an emergency for your friends and neighbors?  How about your fellow country men and women?  Most common sense capable people would agree that you or your loved one's emergency is limited to just you and those immediately affected.  However, the de facto government's misuse and misinterpretation of the word emergency would make your personal health emergency applicable to everyone.  For the common good of course. 

Some people might read that last paragraph and scoff, thinking that Covid-19 was different, that it was not just as simple as a personal health emergency because so many people getting sick at the same time would over run the hospitals.  That is what the mainstream media and de facto government officials argued was it not? 

They told us we needed two weeks to slow the spread.  They told us we needed to mask, social distance and wash our hands. They forced a lock down on us and implemented a blueprint for a safer economy and called it the new normal. They told us is it was not safe to gather and prevented us from visiting our loved ones in care facilities.  They imposed restrictions on our private property, business operations, recreation and travel, and issued stay at home orders and curfews.  They even initiated a military operation on American soil called Operation Warp Speed.  They said we needed to take experimental vaccines if we wanted to end the alleged pandemic. They passed a 2.2 TRILLION dollar bill known as the CARES Act (The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act) on March 27th 2020.  All of the above measures they claimed needed to be implemented in order to prevent our hospitals and emergency services from being over run.

Even after all of these measures played out, and the majority of people took the experimental injections falsely claimed as vaccines, they still made that same argument.  Even after 2.2 trillion dollars and 18 months time to increase hospital ICU capacity, train hospital staff and reinforce emergency services, they still made the same fucking argument for the alleged Delta variant!  If you are still scoffing you need to seek professional help immediately!  It's an emergency!  Just don't get your help from de facto Mono County behavioral ill-health agent Robin Roberts.  They are a true believer that we all need to cope in a Covid world, their new normal.  Robin is likely clinically insane to boot, and if you are still scoffing this late in the game, you are as well.

The next thing we will unpack is how Covid-19 as a declaration of local health emergency has been abused and misused in the context of the law. What conditions must be met in order to declare a local health emergency for an alleged virus?  What criteria must occur to keep a local health emergency in place?

The main law for a local health emergency for a virus is also the same law for when a fire creates hazardous material.  Although, there are some differences in the language we need to focus on (see underlined).

California Code, Health and Safety Code - HSC § 101080:

Whenever a release, spill, escape, or entry of waste occurs as described in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b) of Section 101075 and the director or the local health officer reasonably determines that the waste is a hazardous waste or medical waste, or that it may become a hazardous waste or medical waste because of a combination or reaction with other substances or materials, and the director or local health officer reasonably determines that the release or escape is an immediate threat to the public health, or whenever there is an imminent and proximate threat of the introduction of any contagious, infectious, or communicable disease, chemical agent, noncommunicable biologic agent, toxin, or radioactive agent, the director may declare a health emergency and the local health officer may declare a local health emergency in the jurisdiction or any area thereof affected by the threat to the public health.  Whenever a local health emergency is declared by a local health officer pursuant to this section, the local health emergency shall not remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the board of supervisors, or city council, whichever is applicable to the jurisdiction.  The board of supervisors, or city council, if applicable, shall review, at least every 30 days until the local health emergency is terminated, the need for continuing the local health emergency and shall proclaim the termination of the local health emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant the termination.

We must pay special attention to the first part of the underlined language of HSC 101080 as it sets the parameters for the language that follows.  Unfortunately, we need to do another English lesson here so we can truly understand how this law is intended to be used.  The words, imminent, proximate, and introduction are of extreme importance here.

IMMINENT: ready to take place : happening soon
PROXIMATE: immediately preceding or following (as in a chain of events, causes, or effects)
INTRODUCTION: the act or process of introducing : the state of being introduced

These three words precede the rest of the language in the law so that one can reasonably determine the parameters of its intended purpose.  When you read this law with that in mind you will more easily understand how the declaration of emergency has been misused and abused.

Here is how a legitimate response from a director or health officer declaring a local health emergency for a contagious, infectious, or communicable disease is supposed to unfold: 

1. The director or local health officer reasonably determined Covid-19 was an imminent and proximate threat of being introduced into their jurisdiction (Mono County) and declares a local health emergency.

2. Covid-19 goes from the imminent and proximate threat of the introduction phase to the introduced phase.  Meaning Covid-19 is allegedly in the local health officers jurisdiction.

3. After a period of seven days, the local governing authority terminates the local health emergency as it no longer meets the definition of emergency because the immediacy and urgency of the situation has passed.

That is how HSC 101080 is intended to be used.  Wait just a minute... there is still more language in this law we need to evaluate.  

The law goes on to say, "the local health emergency shall not remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the board of supervisors". 

This is where things get a little more complicated.  The law does not specify what allows an applicable legislative body (board of supervisors) to ratify the the local health emergency to continue beyond seven days.  The only language in the law that gives an idea of what grants the authority to continue the local health emergency comes at the very end.  

"The need for continuing the local health emergency and shall proclaim the termination of the local health emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant the termination".

If we evaluate this language carefully and apply a little common sense, we can safely determine that the authority and legitimacy to ratify the local health emergency beyond seven days stems from the conditions induced by the contagious, infectious, or communicable disease.  What conditions would a director, local health officer, or board of supervisors evaluate to determine if the circumstances warranted NOT terminating the local health emergency at the earliest possible date?  Well, as we covered earlier, the mainstream media and government made it very clear exactly what those conditions are.  The condition of our local emergency services to handle the now introduced contagious, infectious, or communicable disease.  

What conditions did the local health officials, and de facto board of supervisors find that warranted the continuation of the local health emergency for Covid-19?  Were first responders such as paramedics, nurses, doctors, fire, police and sheriff overwhelmed by the conditions caused by Covid-19?  What about the local hospital?  Was Mammoth Hospital overwhelmed by Covid-19 patients to such an extent that they could not handle the influx of hospitalizations?  Was the ICU capacity overwhelmed?  The answer to these questions is a resounding NO! Not a single time over 2+ years!

The de facto Town Council of Mammoth Lakes and the de facto Mono County Board of supervisors even admitted this in their letter to their Governor, Mr. Newsom.

As stated in the letter to their governor, written by the criminals posing as public servants in our local de facto governments;

"Our local and regional medical capacities are not seeing the same impacts from Covid-19 cases".  "Throughout the pandemic, Mammoth Hospital, the only hospital in Mono County, has been able to operate within capacity, and has yet to experience any surge in Covid-19 patients". "Mammoth Hospital continues to operate in green status".
[see the article below titled,  "RECAP - A Closer Look At The Jan 7th 2021 Town Of Mammoth Lakes And Mono County's Letter To Their Governor"]

This begs the question, what conditions existed that would negate the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors legal obligation to terminate the local health emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant?  Sorry folks, but what if's, maybe this or maybe that are not in the law.
 

The only applicable language we are left with in HSC 101080, is that if a local health emergency is ratified beyond seven days, the local legislative body must review at least every 30 days the need for its continuation.  If you thought things couldn't get any more complicated than they already are, you are in for a treat. 

This brings us to the next layer of de facto government bull shit. Governor Newsom's Proclamation Of A State Of Emergency. 

The parts of the proclamation that are relevant here are orders number 7 and 8 (linked above). Orders 7 and 8 waive a local governing authority's obligation to review the need to continue the local health emergency every 30 and 60 days respectively. Apparently, the governor thought that if he waived the obligation for local governing authorities to review the need to continue the local health emergency, the local governing authorities would not determine the earliest possible date that conditions warranted terminating the emergency.  However, the governors order did not waive the obligation to terminate the emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant. Wow! That is some serious criminal negligence and incompetence!

Well now, it seems the governor played the local government officials for fools.  Since when did a governor's role encompass both the executive branch of government and the legislative branch? Think about that for a bit.  What does that insinuate if a governor can waive the obligation to follow the law?  Apparently, the legal counsels for the Town of Mammoth Lakes Inc. and Mono County Inc. think it means that committing fraud is legal. HELLO! A governor's orders do not legalize breaking the law.  Bad news for the de facto Mono County Inc. imbeciles that never got the memo from their legal counsels.

Order 8 is practically the same as order 7, except it applies to California Code, Government Code - GOV § 8630. A similar law to HSC 101080 but falls under the California Emergency Services Act . 

California Code, Government Code - GOV § 8630
(a) A local emergency may be proclaimed only by the governing body of a city, county, or city and county, or by an official designated by ordinance adopted by that governing body.
(b) Whenever a local emergency is proclaimed by an official designated by ordinance, the local emergency shall not remain in effect for a period in excess of seven days unless it has been ratified by the governing body.
(c) The governing body shall review the need for continuing the local emergency at least once every 60 days until the governing body terminates the local emergency.
(d) The governing body shall proclaim the termination of the local emergency at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.

This law is worth mentioning so we can add it to the list of laws the de facto Mono County government officials are violating.  The more laws violated by these criminally insane idiots the more time they spend in prison! YAAAY!

Okay, we need to take a step back now.  We established that the de facto Mono County government officials have blatantly violated HSC101080 as well as Government Code 8630.  Now we need to point out some of the even more serious crimes that occurred when they violated these two laws. 

When the evidence of an emergency is lacking, or in this case, never existed, and someone makes the false claim that an emergency exists, that is a crime.  As we covered in Mountain View Fire part 1, Penal Code 148.3 PC is the California statute that makes it a crime for a person to make a false report of an emergency.  No evidence that Covid-19 created the conditions to continue a local health emergency occurred.  As admitted by the de facto Town Council of Mammoth Lakes and de facto Mono County governments letter to their governor  Ouch, that's a misdemeanor that carries a maximum fine of $1,000 and up to a year in county jail.

18 US Code 1040 also covered in part 1 Mountain View Fire - 18 US Code 1040 makes it a FELONY to perpetrate fraud in connection with major disaster or emergency benefits.  Once again, if there is no emergency but you acquire and appropriate emergency funding, that is fraud.


Penal Code 504 PC makes a public officer guilty of embezzlement (PC 503) if he or she: fraudulently uses any public property or funds, and uses them in a way not consistent with their official authority.  Since there never was an emergency, the official authority to issue emergency funds from FEMA or the CARES Act was done fraudulently.  When the amount of public funds exceeds $950.00, which is the case, it  qualifies as grand theft – PC 487. Even more prison time and a substantial fine for that one. 


In conclusion, all de facto governing bodies in Mono County committed fraud with emergency funds under an emergency declaration that has no legal standing.  The de facto Town Council of Mammoth Lakes and the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors illegal state of emergency constituted the circumstances which created a massive chain of fraud in all governing bodies within their local jurisdictions.  Watch the short clip below as the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors openly discuss their intention to end the local health emergencies when funding eligibility dries up.  Wow, they really are keeping the local health emergencies going solely for the funding!

  On the January 11th 2022 Covid-19 update yet another unsettling action by the de facto Mono County Health Department was brought to attention.  This time, the victim of unethical practices conducted by the health department was none other than the daughter (a minor) of one of the de facto board of supervisors, Jennifer Kreitz.  Apparently, the department of health is so desperate to track, trace, and generate a "case" of Covid-19 that one of their tactics is to prey upon unsuspecting minors!  This unethical practice took place just one month after the scandal at a Mammoth Unified School District Covid-19 injection campaign on December 10 2021.   A child was mistakenly injected with a Covid-19 medical intervention without parental consent.  That makes two unethical violations that involved minors in a month!  Despite Jennifer Kreitz's frustration with public health's unethical practice involving her daughter, it appears that nobody was reprimanded for this action.  In fact, it appears there was no consequence at all for those in the health department involved with targeting minors to get their private health information.  The de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors has not terminated their contract with the Department of Health Director Bryan Wheeler, indicating they are fine with these unethical practices.

February 1 2022 - Two of the most important aspects of public health are integrity and reliable data.  Without integrity and reliable data, public health has zero credibility.  When public health officials intentionally misrepresent facts and data it can be considered nothing less than propaganda.  

A member of the public at the 2/1/22 de facto board of supervisors meeting sent in a letter of correspondence regarding their concern about a change in the data presented on the Mono County Corona Virus Response web page.  The letter of correspondence questioned why two key metrics were deleted and why the county health department swapped out their local data and statistics for California Department of Public Health data and statistics.  When the director of the Mono County Health Department Bryan Wheeler was questioned about the recent changes to the metrics on their website, he claimed their IT department reverted the changes [video clip above].  As of February 8, 2022, the metrics presented on the Corona Virus Response webpage have remained unchanged. 

Now let's unpack the changes which were made to the data presented on the Mono County Coronavirus Response web page throughout the fraud that is the declaration of emergency in response to Case-19.


The four screenshots below illustrate the changes made to the data and statistics that the de facto Mono County Department of Health wanted presented on their website.  [Screenshot 1 was was taken on March 19 2021, screenshot 2 was taken on September 25 2021, screenshot 3 was taken on December 1 2021and screenshot 4 was taken on January 27 2022.]

Initially the health department displayed the total tests performed by the de facto Mono County Department of Public Health as well as third parties such as Alphabet/Google's Project Baseline by Verily, Labcorp, Optum Serve, and local businesses that cooperated with the health department such as Mammoth Mountain.  The data included total tests, negative test results and positive "cases". 

What changes were made from screenshot 1 to screenshot 2?  Sometime between March19 2021 and September 2021 the total test count and negative test count were removed.  These two stats were replaced with positive cases among fully vaccinated and percentage of positive cases for unvaccinated. 

By December 1st 2021 (screenshot 3) the information displayed had once again been changed.  The stats for unvaccinated were removed!  Perhaps this number was not helping to promote Mono County official's false medical claims about the Covid-19 injections?  Maybe they just thought unvaccinated statistics were no longer of importance?

On the fourth screenshot taken January 27, 2022 the positive "cases" for fully vaccinated stat was also removed, and all that was left was positive cases. 
As mentioned previously, another change to the data was that the statistics presented no longer came from the Mono County Department of Health record keeping.  The county records were swapped out for California Department of Public Health records.  This is illustrated by the CDPH acronym under positive cases and the icon on the bottom right of the screenshots changing from, "Case Stats", to "CDPH Case Stats". 

Something that really stands out between December 1, 2021 (SS3) and January 27, 2022 (SS4) is the massive increase to the number of positive cases.  In less than two months, cases jumped from 1,666 to 2,826.  That is an increase of 1,160 cases within two months! To put that into perspective, nearly 59% of all "cases" since record keeping began took place within two months!  Wow!  Those Injections Mono County officials mislead you into believing were vaccines clearly did not help reduce the "case" numbers now did they?  For those of you out there who got the injections and are ready to face the facts, you might consider first softening the blow by deluding yourself into thinking that the injections actually do work, and its just those darn faulty Covid tests detecting the flu and producing false positives.  Meh, just a suggestion.

So many unanswered questions, two more being, does combining the cases of unvaccinated and the cases of vaccinated mean that the health department no longer recognizes any significant difference between the two groups?  What other statistics is the CDPH privy to that the local health department isn't privy to besides injection numbers from private businesses such as Rite Aid? 

What conclusion can we come to when evaluating the "case" statistics?  The case stats prove that every single measure put in place by the de facto Mono County Inc. government to prevent the spread of the alleged Covid-19 virus has failed. That includes everything from the lock down, business restrictions, stay at home order, blueprint for a safer economy, mask measure, social distancing, hand sanitizing, and Covid-19 injections.  All of this is assuming that you are still foolish enough to be under the impression that a positive "case" equates to being infected with Covid-19.  

On a final note.  The symptoms of Influenza and so called Covid-19 are not just "similar", as Bryan Wheeler claims.  They are in fact, the same.  There are no unique symptoms attributed to the alleged Sars-Cov-2 virus. Which begs the question.  Why the double standard? If Mammoth hospital is testing people for influenza as well as Covid because the symptoms are similar, why then is the department of health only testing for Covid-19 and not for influenza?  Why does influenza need to have a "diagnosis" and not Covid-19? 

  Happy new year! In with the new out with the old?  Unfortunately, it looks like 2022 is picking up where 2021 left off.  Lets start with the CDC admitting that the PCR tests that have been used from the start of the so called pandemic are not reliable.  Yeah, its old news for many of us who have done a little independent research into the topic but now its official from the CDC.  The CDC now recommends not to use the PCR test to detect Covid-19... and there is really only one other option being used en mass.  The rapid antigen test. The Biden administration allegedly distributed 500 million rapid antigen tests across the United States.  Really?  The same tests that health officials have been telling us for nearly 2 years are not accurate and had to be backed up with a "confirmatory" PCR test?   I mean, it's all so ridiculous its hard not to laugh in shock.  Alas, many of us clear thinkers have lost any humor in the situation... about 21 months ago now. 

How accurate are the antigen tests according to the de facto Mono County officials?  They are claiming an 80ish percent accuracy rate IF you have influenza/cold like symptoms.  If you have no symptoms then the tests are not accurate at all.  Please note, there are over a dozen different manufacturers and around 24 different versions of these antigen tests.  Only a handful of these tests have been updated since the so called Omicron variant supposedly became dominant.  Additionally, these tests are also designed to pick up a wide swath of infections and can not distinguish between different infections.  If you are sick and have symptoms, all the antigen test does is confirm that you are sick with something but can not diagnose what you are sick with.  Sometimes the antigen test will give a negative result even when you do have symptoms.  They are completely unreliable.

In order to actually be diagnosed with a disease you must have a licensed physician run you through an extensive screening process after which they will give their best guess as to what your symptoms are caused by.  When you get a positive result with the antigen test, the same as with the PCR test, you will be labeled a"case"of Covid-19. Regardless of what you are actually infected with or not infected with! The only major difference between the fraud that is the PCR test and the fraud that is the antigen test is the time frame for when it can detect a wide swath of molecules that may or may not be the cause of your symptoms. 

One way to explain testing for Covid-19 is to picture a fisherman throwing a net into the water and catching a bunch of different fish.  The fisherman's net will catch Bass, Salmon, Perch, and Trout but everything will be called Catfish even when no there are no Catfish in the net.  Even when Catfish has never been isolated or identified in the lake the fisherman is casting his net, everything that the fisherman catches in the net will be called Catfish.  Catfish being Covid-19.

Right...  Okay, lets give them the benefit of the doubt here and give them their 80% accuracy.  So 20% of the time you will get a false positive? Or is it 20% of the time you will get a false negative?  Maybe its10% of the time you will get a false positive and 10% chance you will get a false negative? 

Would it be fair to call it a 10% chance for a false positive just for sake of argument?  Let's do a little math and also pretend that these tests can actually diagnose disease and distinguish between multitudes of variants.

2,000 people get an antigen test and 10% give a false positive.  That is 200 people who now have Covid-19 when they do not.  Lets say 100 of these people are required to or feel compelled to report their false positive antigen test to the health department. Bam! Now we have 100 new fraudulent "cases".  Just what they needed to instill more fear and achieve their main objective of getting as many people possible injected.

Wait, not so fast, is Mono County still backing up antigen tests with the PCR test for confirmation?  Even after the CDC said not to use it anymore?  The same PCR test which the FDA says can not distinguish between influenza, bacterial infection or Covid-19.  The same PCR test which also detects these molecules months after infections and gives positive results.  Either way, we now have 100 new "cases" of Covid-19!  Throw in some negative antigen tests from those double maskers who insist on getting that so called "confirmatory" PCR test and they can potentially crank out even more "cases"!

The de facto Mono County Department of Health Director, Bryan Wheeler once again admits that the PCR tests will generate a positive "case" months after someone experiences any influenza like symptoms.  That's right, if you got a positive PCR test and it was reported to the health department, regardless if you were sick or not you helped keep this illegal, immoral, horrendous fraud going by generating a "case".  I think you deserve a nice golf clap for this one!  Thanks for being a participant in the greatest fraud ever perpetrated on humanity by your superior master race, the technocrats, and their BFF the artificial intelligence.  An artificial intelligence being sold to you as a vaccine that you most likely begged to be injected into your body without ever asking what the ingredients were.  Heck you would make the ideal person to play poker with if you weren't shedding out wicked variants of only god knows what with your new MRNA graphene operating system.  This somewhat demeaning talk about those who got the injections is simply another attempt to wake them up out of their hysteria.  Apparently ridicule sometimes works as a wake up call in these bizarre mass hysteria events.

Bob "something in my pocket" Gardner makes a great point for once!  Mr. Gardner enjoyed some holiday flights and did some traveling (while reminding everyone about all the cases in our county, crying global pandemic for nearly 2 years and supporting the lock down and business closures) and he had this to say, "I certainly put on an N-95 mask and they are very tight, they are suffocating". 

Wow, yeah what a great point he makes! Hey, you got to give credit where credit is due right?  However, this brings up a very important point that is of extreme relevance to our mountain community.  If N-95 masks are "suffocating", don't you think that would be useful health information for people to hear while visiting a high elevation mountain resort?  Some of us clear thinkers have been saying this all along, masks reduce oxygen intake while increasing CO2 uptake.  We wanted the health department to warn the community and unsuspecting tourists of the potential dangers of wearing a mask as it pertains to a potentially life threatening condition called hypoxia.  For those of you who have not heard of hypoxia it is defined as;

1. Deficiency in the amount of oxygen reaching body tissues.
2. Decrease below normal levels of oxygen in inspired gases, arterial blood, or tissue, without reaching anoxia. (anoxia means no oxygen present)

Signs and symptoms of hypoxia include:

• Changes in skin color, ranging from blue to cherry red
• Blue skin, lips, and fingernails
• Confusion
• Disorientation
• Coughing
• Fast heart rate
• Rapid breathing
• Shortness of breath
• Slow heart rate
• Sweating
• Wheezing
• Headache

[coincidence that some of these hypoxia symptoms or "altitude sickness", could be mistaken for infection with Covid-19 compelling people to get tested?]

Despite our efforts to get the de facto Mono County government to inform people of this crucial information they chose to ignore us and push their color of law "MASKS REQUIRED" narrative.  Many people experience hypoxia related side effects while visiting a high altitude environment without wearing a mask at all.  Put on a suffocating mask and you could end up with a severe case of hypoxia all thanks to the "health" department.  Lets look a little deeper into the seriousness of this criminal negligence by the de facto Mono County government.  Most of the tourists that come to visit Mammoth Lakes, CA come from an elevation that ranges from sea level (0 feet) to around 2,000 feet.  Lower elevations have significantly more oxygen in the atmosphere than higher elevations.  The amount of oxygen available in the air at sea level is 20.9%.  At 2,000 feet of elevation the oxygen is about 19.4%... The oxygen levels at 8,000 feet are about 15.4%, and the elevation at the top of Mammoth Mountain is 11,054 feet with an oxygen level of 13.7%!  What does the US Department of Labor — OSHA have to say about oxygen levels in the environment?;

”Oxygen deficient is any atmosphere that contains less than 19.5%. This happens when the oxygen is
displaced by inert gas such as CARBON DIOXIDE and is the leading cause of FATALITIES.”

So Mr. Gardner said N-95 masks are suffocating at the same time both the de facto Mono County Health Officer Caryn Slack and Director of Public Health Bryan Wheeler grinned from ear to ear simultaneously nodding their heads in agreement!  Yet not a single warning to the public about the hazards of masks and hypoxia in a low oxygen environment!  Public health purposefully disregarded this information and consequently put peoples lives at risk!  Perhaps people have even died as a consequence of this criminal negligence?  Just one more great example for those under the spell of mass psychosis that wonder why us clear thinkers don't trust the government.

Once again the de facto Mono County Board of Supervisors breaks USA Inc. federal laws and state laws without consequence.  The topic at hand yet again is the illegal, unconstitutional mask measure.  The de facto Mono County Inc. board of supervisors continues to conspire against the rights of its own constituents by attempting to enforce the mask measure.  The Town of Mammoth Lakes and Mono County are in cahoots with the compromised Caltrans/new arm of the health department.  Even though it goes completely against Caltran's own guidelines, they are using changeable message signs to display non traffic related messages.  Changeable message signs which are displaying the color of law message of "Masks Required Indoors".  Caltrans is not supposed to use changeable message signs for anything but traffic related information, yet here they are, blatantly violating their own agencies guidelines plus both title 18 U.S. Code § 241 - Conspiracy against rights and title 18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law.  Even while Mono County is faced with stormy and hazardous road conditions these de facto imbeciles would rather push their color of law message that masks are required indoors instead of giving helpful road condition information. These parasites are absolutely criminal, misguided, negligent, insane and despicable! 

A message to all the businesses in Mono County:  If you enforce any of the illegal and unconstitutional Covid-19 measures you are in fact breaking the law!  You are in fact conspiring to deprive people of their rights under color of law, depriving people of their rights under color of law, in addition to violating the USA Inc Constitution, California Inc. Constitution, the Civil Rights act of 1964 and the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act.   

The de facto Covid cult fascists are still attempting to enforce the mask measure but they can't seem to find anyone to take up the task.  When Jennifer Kreitz mentions mask measure enforcement to Bryan Wheeler he gives us a little insight into his true dictatorial nature.  He unwittingly says, "Unfortunately we don't have much ability to actually force people to do anything at this point, we do not have that support or capability"  There you have it, this anti-American pharma Nazi Bryan Wheeler would love to have the support and capability to force people against their will and rights to illegal and unconstitutional practices!  Why won't the Mammoth Lakes Police Department enforce the mask measure?  Why won't the Sheriffs department enforce the mask measure?  The answer is, as it has been from the start, that there is no law to enforce... only color of law.   Unfortunately, there are reports that both MLPD and the Sheriff's department have used trespassing as a color of law scapegoat to enforce the illegal mask measure upon non mask compliant individuals.  How sad it is that they are willing to break their oath to the constitution and conspire against and in actuality, deprive people of their rights under color of law!

So here we have more blatant examples of government officials violating their own laws but where are the people who are supposed to hold these parasites accountable? The Sheriff is supposed to arrest criminal law breakers but she has proven herself in dereliction of duty and complicit in crimes against humanity, so she can be discounted as a co-conspirator.  Next in line for this task is the office of the de facto Mono County District Attorney Tim Kendall.  He has been informed of this issue among others, but the guy is a complete coward with no spine, no integrity, no morality and can be called nothing less than a co-conspirator for the 100% corrupt and evil USA Inc. government.  Not to mention this corrupt political hack interprets the law in such a convoluted way that up is down and wrong is right.  Prove yourself otherwise Mr. Kendall, the time is running short for you to pick which side of history you want to be on.  Although, since you have already been looking the other way when it comes to your fellow de facto government comrades crimes for nearly 2 years now, it seems you have already chosen your side... the dark side.  Sucks to be you, you good for nothing sellout!  There is a word for those who swore an oath to the constitution and violate that oath.  TRAITOR!

Literally every government agency is taking part in the conspiracy to deprive Americans of their rights.  All under the guise of a virus that has not been isolated or laboratory confirmed and has a 99.997% survival rate according to the de facto Centers for Disease Control.  A virus that is so deadly and contagious that half the time you have no symptoms and have to be tested to know if you have it.  Tests that are unfit to detect or diagnose what they claim to which in turn generates a pandemic of "cases".  The fact is, if you are getting tested you are the pandemic.. you are part of the problem and you will never end your new normal!  Live this lie to your own detriment and your eventual demise.

Dangerous times indeed.  Make no mistake, the de facto government has declared war against we the people and they are pushing the good people to a breaking point.  All by design.  The evil forces go to tactic against good is to push us, poke us and push us some more until we are forced to take action.  Then they play the victim card when they have been and always are the aggressors. These de facto nut jobs care nothing for we the people or even their USA Inc. Constitution. They are in fact supposed to represent their local jurisdictions populations and nothing else.   More people must come to the realization that their local de facto governments are in fact their enemy.  An enemy which represents state government, federal government, and big pharma.  If more people do not figure this fact out soon, history shows us that this will end very very badly!