I would like to convey a bit of information as to why wastewater surveillance for the alleged Covid virus and other communicable diseases is unfit for purpose. I say alleged Covid virus because the concept of respiratory viruses is only a theory, not a fact. The Mono County Department of Health claims wastewater surveillance would help measure Covid virus and other communicable disease levels present in the community but their claim is an unfounded steaming pile of excrement. My first point - 1.) According to the CDC's webpage on wasterwater surveillance, "it is not possible to reliably and accurately predict the number of infected individuals in a community based on wastewater testing." This statement from the CDC contradicts the purpose for wastewater surveillance claimed by the Mono County Department of Health. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My second point - 2.) According to the 2021 Mammoth Community Water District Consumer Confidence Report, there is an average of .87 parts per million of Residual Chlorine in the water supply. The standard amount of chlorine sufficient to kill biologicals is 0.5 PPM, as agreed by most scientists. As soon as waste enters the water supply, the residual chlorine begins to interact with the waste as well as all the accompanying bacteria and alleged Covid virus. The residual free chlorine breaks the chemical bonds of bacteria and viruses by breaking the chemical bonds in their molecules..chemically oxidizing their cell walls so that they literally 'explode'. This process destroys all the properties of the molecule. Molecules by definition are the smallest particles of a substance that retain ALL of the properties of the substance (such as RNA, DNA, Proteins Etc.) Therefore, the residual chlorine in the water supply will destroy the very RNA sequences that Covid-19 testing methods use to allegedly detect the SARS-Cov-2 virus. This negates the entire premise made by the Mono County Department of Health for wastewater surveillance to measure the levels of Covid-19 virus and other communicable diseases in the community. Any alteration and destruction of pathogen levels from residual chlorine makes accurate wastewater surveillance of pathogen levels in the community impossible. Public health officials will not be able to determine pathogen levels and related infection present in the community using wastewater surveillance. Wastewater surveillance is not fit for the purpose proposed by the Department of Health. Reactivity of Viral Nucleic Acids with Chlorine and the Impact of Virus Encapsidation Chlorine Dioxide Mode of Action on Viruses "Chlorine bleach fast-acting oxidizing agent and has broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against a wide range of microorganisms including bacteria, bacterial spores, viruses and fungi. It quickly reacts with organic material including proteins, lipids, carbohydrates, DNA and RNA, which ultimately leads to cell death" Differences in Viral Disinfection Mechanisms as Revealed by Quantitative Transfection of Echovirus 11 Genomes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- My third point - 3.) On another note, I also consider wastewater surveillance for Covid-19 virus and other communicable diseases illegal. Wastewater surveillance for Covid-19 is a medical experiment. The testing methods utilized for Covid-19 are still under Emergency Use Authorization and are not FDA approved. Therefore, experimental. Testing for Covid-19 virus with any method, is subject to the laws for medical experimentation. California Health and Safety Code - 24172, also known as the experimental subject's bill of rights is applicable. And I do not consent to any such experimentation. Even if testing methods were fully FDA approved, I do not consent to any form of government surveillance policies which intend to deprive me of my creator imbued natural rights. Such as breathing oxygen and taking a dump without government interventionism. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0 Comments
In the July 30 edition of The Sheet, on page 2 & 14, Jack Lunch wrote an article titled "Fascism: A Warning" where he shares some personal details about his views on Covid-19, and related policies. The article itself is not solely about Covid-19, but more of a hodge podge of examples about the rise of fascism from the past as it relates to the current state of American politics and clashing ideologies. Although I will not be dissecting fascism in great depth, I will briefly touch on the main topic of the article. First off, to Mr. Lunch's credit, he was somewhat willing to paint fascism as a sickness that both the "left" and the "right" are predisposed to, and that is a step in the right direction. For both sides of the political spectrum are vulnerable to the state of darkness that fascism represents. Yes, it is true that many of the most well known examples of fascism happened under the guise of "leftist" concepts such as Socialism, Communism, Bolshevism etc. However, there are plenty of examples when fascism rises under the guise of "rightist" concepts such as Nationalism, Nativism, Falangism etc. The true reasons why fascism and its equally dark cousins, authoritarianism and totalitarianism are not a unique sickness of the "left" or of the "right", is because beyond the veil of political ideology lies three common denominators. Power, control, and government. Whether it is the "lefts" brand of fascism or the "rights" brand of fascism, both use government to enact their agendas. As the 19th century British politician, historian, and moralist known as Lord Acton famously said, "power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely". Regardless if it is team left or team right, team Trump or team Biden, team Bush or team Obama, team Red or team Blue, the power hungry care not which team scores the goal so they can feast on the ambrosia of power. Teams are simply a tool, a mechanism for control, used by those who inhabit the top of the pyramid. Who or what is at the top of the pyramid? Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild summarized one of the main strategies utilized for controlling power with this quote, "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes it's laws". Time to transition over to Mr. Lunch's Covid-19 comments. Before I rip on this guy's obvious lack of thinking through his position on Covid-19 and related policies, I want to acknowledge something. Putting your self out there, letting your stance be known, and owning your truth are noble actions for a healthy society. We need more people who are willing to openly share their beliefs and positions on the biggest and most controversial topics of our time. We need honest and good debate. We need to listen to the scrutiny of those who disagree with us or identify with a different brand. We ought not let our emotions and feelings determine reality, but seek the truth even when it is difficult or painful to confront. So kudos to Mr. Lunch for sharing some of the details in his personal journey with Covid-19 and related policies. Ahem: JL- "here are my thoughts on Rogitz’s letter, (page 4) especially now that I have experienced Covid. As to my own recent experience with Covid, I finally came down with it post-July 4" Mr. Lunch finally experienced Covid-19 eh? Really? Mr. Lunch, are you seriously of the belief that you somehow managed to avoid getting infected with what the government and media told you was a HIGHLY contagious disease for the last two and a half years? What measures did you take that allowed you to allude the invisible enemy for so long? I am sure the health department would love to know. How do you know you finally got Covid? Let me guess, you got tested and the test told you so? Without the tests telling you what your symptoms were caused by, how would you have ever concluded that you "finally came down with it"? JL- The fear was real. At the outset, medical experts suggested a 3-4% death rate for those infected. Over time, that was not borne out. Lunch got this right, but the fear was real because of fear mongering by medical "experts" WHO suggested a 3-4% death rate for those infected based on models and assumptions, not facts. "Over time that was not borne out" comes off as Lunch's way to defend the government's policy response. By the way, the amount of time it took for the 3-4% death rate to be borne out was less than a month. Yet government imposed their extreme policies for a year and a half + and still cling to their emergency declarations. Lunch was on team Covid fascist and did nothing to oppose it. Hopefully he learned a valuable lesson that it is a horrible idea for government to implement and impose policies based on assumptions and speculations. JL- "Myself, I read Alex Berenson’s book “Pandemia” late last year and that certainly changed my perspective on the pandemic." I admittedly have not read Alex Berenson's book, in fact I have never heard of him before I read Mr. Lunch's article. I did a little research on him and he is labeled as on the "right" and is considered very critical of the governments Covid-19 policies. I liken him to other Covid-19 promoters on the "right" with similar positions such as Chris Martenson and Dr. Mercola. They all feed the notion that there was/is indeed a pandemic due to a novel Coronavirus. So long as actors on the "right" and actors on the "left" legitimize Covid-19 by focusing on the policies and not question the lack of evidence that a pandemic actually occurred, they are serving those at the top of the pyramid. Knowingly or unknowingly. Why don't these Covid-19 promoters show proof of a laboratory confirmed, isolated, purified and identified SARS-CoV-2 virus? The fact checkers tell us there are samples being studied everywhere, yet FOIA requests across the world tell us otherwise. What about those fraudulent tests that everyone uses to "confirm" they had Covid? Does Alex Berenson's book cover that? Such a pity that you had to read Alex Berenson's book, which released in Nov 2021, to come to some of the same conclusions many of us reached as early as April-May 2020. JL- "for the record, I am vaxxed and boosted. I had decided against the second booster after reading Mr. Berenson’s book. But now I am reconsidering. Why? Because when I got my shots, they’d lay me out for about a day or so. But when you have Covid, and if you have sensitivity towards fellow human beings, you’re really out of commission for 5-7 days (when you’re infectious) and some symptoms lingered for me beyond that window." This part is quite insightful. I have struggled to understand how people can actually justify injecting themselves with these experimental substances. Every little bit of insight given by those willing to take the mystery juice is welcome. So Lunch claims he got Covid, even though he got vaxxed and boosted once... and Pandemia gave him second thoughts about getting the second booster but he is now reconsidering... because the shots lay him out for a day or so vs. the 5-7 days if he gets Covid. WHAT? The logic behind this thought process is bogus dude. You need to think this one through a little more Mr. Lunch. How can you argue that getting the second booster will only lay you out for a day or so vs the 5-7 days when you still allegedly got Covid after getting injected bro? The injections do not prevent you from testing positive for Covid. Let me reiterate that, even if you opt to get that second booster, you will get laid out for a day or so and still potentially test positive for Covid. You are not thinking clearly. Sounds like you bought the lie that the injections prevent infection and transmission of disease, even after your own lived experience proved that it is not true. Do you realize that means you never got informed consent? JL- "One day versus 5-7 days - I no longer approach Covid from a fear perspective so much as from a practical perspective. What affords me the least amount of time on the sidelines? What affords me the best means to protect those whom I come in contact with?" Lunch got mind raped hard by the narrative shapers and still can't shake it. What affords you the least amount of time on the sidelines? Definitely not those Covid-19 injections, that is for sure! You even admitted you had symptoms beyond 5-7 days even after three injections! What affords you the best means to protect those whom you come in contact with? Definitely not those Covid-19 injections, that is for sure! How many boosters are you gonna take before you realize they don't do jack, Jack? Actually, I am pretty sure they do something, just not what was advertised... You know those folk at the top of the pyramid I mentioned earlier? Well they think the world is overpopulated bro. They think there are too many people using too much stuff bro. They think there is a climate crisis caused by you, me and the landscapers using lawn mowers and leaf blowers. They also think there are too many people like me who think for ourselves and are a threat to their power and control bro. Yeah, there is definitely a reason why they pushed those injections like it was the final solution. I mean, the world was in total cahoots for masks, tests, and injections... almost like there was some ultra powerful group dishing out orders to every country around the world. Naaah, that's just crazy talk. JL- "As for all the dust-up regarding masks ... yeah, I’m not too convinced they’re super-effective. But as Berenson wrote, he thinks health officials continued to push mask use for psychological reasons - that seeing a mask was a reminder of potential danger, a reminder not to get too close for too long." Yep. The masks are not effective at what they are claimed to be effective at. However, they are super effective for other reasons. Berenson is correct, the masks were pushed for psychological reasons. Masks take the psychological phenomenon of the invisible enemy from intangible to tangible. If everyone is wearing masks, then it must be real! Even though we are all slamming the Walmart's like there is no pandemic, the masks and tests tell us there is! This sure is one great dissection on injections, detection, and infections, if I do say so myself. Thanks for reading! |
AuthorWilliam Wallace Archives
December 2022
Categories |