By Anna Von Reitz As my son, the hard core researcher into all historical rabbit holes has observed, the problem with history is all the omissions. And an omission left uncorrected often has the same effect as an outright lie, because it leads people to make false assumptions and adopt false beliefs. There is so much we simply don’t know, especially as regards world history, because the English language press and English textbooks omitted it— almost always with the unstated intention to make the Brits and their affiliates look better. I recently made the mistake of saying that Texas was the only State to have formed a separate stand-alone Republic prior to adopting Statehood, and noted that Hawaii was Kingdom —- which it was, however, what was omitted from my knowledge was the existence of a brief transitional Republic of Hawai’i . Essentially a junta of sugar planters eager to remove tariffs and trade restrictions blocking them from American mainland markets overthrew the Hawaiian Monarchy in 1893. U.S. Marines promptly landed on Oahu in support, and the British Territorial United States recognized the Republic of Hawai’i under the leadership of Sanford B. Dole — as in Dole Pineapple. This phony Republic run by American entrepreneurs who had moved to the islands to exploit their agricultural potential lasted five years, until Hawaii was “annexed” by “the” United States in July of 1898. The word “annexed” glosses over the hostile take over involved — but it was at that point a take over against the Lesser American Big Fish like Dole, who exercised a king-like authority over most of the Hawaiian work force, and the District Government Big Fish in Washington, D.C. For the people of Hawaii it meant one thing— foreign oligarchies operating under a racist British-American Imperialist scheme, taking over and running everything. The American home markets were thrown wide open to Hawaiian products and a vast amount of infrastructure began to appear — ports and roads and electrical grids and later airfields. So-called American Expansionism had gained its first offshore base in the Pacific—- but upon further consideration we have to ask was this “American” Expansionism or actually British Imperialism at work? The American Federal Republic fell in 1860 and still awaits Reconstruction. Who or what was at the political helm of this country in international affairs during the decades following the end of the Civil War? The Scottish Commercial Corporation impersonating us as “The United States of America”——Incorporated. It wasn’t “American Expansionism” at all. It was British Expansionism by proxy that led to the annexation of Hawaii and which had engineered the Republic of Hawai’i five years previously, too. The people of Hawaii had precious little role in any of these developments so perhaps that is why the existence of the Republic of Hawai’i — unlike the Republic of Texas, drops through the cracks in the history books. In any event, I stand corrected. There was a Republic of Hawai’i run for a period of five years by foreign Robber Barons whose progeny remain ensconced in ill-gotten positions of political and economic power to this day. The main players in this charade of freedom and democracy were Americans only in terms of place of birth; politically, they were Tories, adopting British Territorial United States Citizenship, and operating their businesses in Hawaii as British Crown Corporations—- and all singing the same tune of British Colonialism and British Imperialism, howbeit with an American accent. While the actual Americans were peacefully at home, our British Territorial Subcontractors were busy “representing” us and doing things we never authorized them to do—- and all at our expense. Many people have assumed that “American Imperialism” was actually American, but no, these actions in Hawaii were carried out “in our names” by Scottish Commercial Corporation subcontractors who were supposed to be providing us with good faith “essential government services” in our own country- not ramming around the Pacific impersonating us and using our credit to back their piracy. America didn’t annex Hawaii—- the Scottish Interlopers annexed Hawaii while impersonating us. And that is quite a different thing, requiring us and everyone else involved to look at the history of Hawaii and our relationship with the Hawaiian people with new eyes. They have only recently, as of October 2020, been formally enrolled as an American State of the Union, owing to the fact that our American Government wasn’t in Session in 1959 when Hawaii entered a quasi-statehood as a British Territorial Confederate State doing business as the State of Hawaii. As such, Hawaii has never been administered as a true State of the Union and Hawaii’s people have never experienced the freedom and security they are owed. They have instead labored under the foreign Raj-like British Territorial United States District Government and suffered its predation. These same British Interlopers are guilty of the mistreatment of the American Indians and the genocidal practices employed against them, the implementation of the “Reservation” system—- think: “Federal Reserve”—- and so much more. As usual, Great Britain is at the bottom of the dog pile—- and both here and elsewhere we see the same patterns of deceit, impersonation, omission, failure to disclose, credit theft, breach of trust and misrepresentation. It has been accomplished by similar means throughout the known world — implemented by bankers headquartered in the Inner City of London, and enforced by attorneys — also headquartered in the Inner City of London. The Fleet Street Banks and Temple Bar Attorneys have operated a vast criminal conspiracy against the rest of the world, with their members impersonating entire governments —- including ours, for decades at a time. Our own people have suffered as a result and we have unwittingly been used as mercenaries in support of criminal activities — pillaging and illegal confiscation at home, piracy abroad. Next, we will consider one of the largest, bloodiest and most expensive wars in “American” history— the Philippine-American War, which by an Act of Omission that staggers even my imagination, has been all-but completely forgotten. It lasted fifteen years. It cost hundreds of millions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of lives. By comparison, the Spanish-American War that precipitated the Philippine-American War, was a ten week spat, not even a paper cut, by comparison. One must ask why a war that dwarfed Viet Nam by many orders of magnitude has been “forgotten” and omitted from the history books entirely or given only a footnote? Could it be that the Government of Westminster — the epicenter of all this criminality and it’s partner in crime, the Inner City of London, have something to hide? ---------------------------- See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here.
0 Comments
The exception is Texas. Texas has a unique history. Texas began as a regional province of Mexico — a very sparsely inhabited domain. So the Mexican Government offered generous land grants to encourage people to move to Texas, 640 acres per man, 320 each for his wife and every child, 80 acres per slave. All you had to do was behave yourself under Mexican Law and convert to Roman Catholicism and you were given all this land. For people who were already Roman Catholics it was a no-brainer, and no big obstacle for those without strong religious conviction, either. Soon would-be colonists from the United States began petitioning the Mexican Government to let them into Texas and the Mexicans agreed. 300 families affiliated with Mr. Austin, a lawyer and politician from Missouri, crossed the border and settled in what is now Texas. They flourished. More colonists from the Caribbean and Louisiana and foreign countries joined them. Soon, the Mexican Government started treating Texas like a foreign country and imposing special tariffs and taxes on Texans. Resentment festered. Fights broke out along the border and at seaports and soon, Texans were in open rebellion against Mexico. The rest of the story? The Texans won their independence from Mexico and formed their own independent country which they operated under a separate government modeled after the Roman Republic. It was several years later that Texas became one of the Several States of the Union, so alone among the American States, Texas has a history of being a separate country with its own form of government— a Republic of Texas. There is no history of any other “State Republics” prior to Statehood, so all these people chasing around and claiming that they are restoring “state republics” are talking wind. There were never any such state republics other than Texas. Hawaii was a separate Kingdom, but not a republic — a monarchy. So. Once again, Americans are proving that they know nothing about their own history and that they are prey to all sorts of incorrect assumptions as a result. Our state governments in the rest of the country begin and end as states having a “republican form of government” — which is to say, they were never Roman-style Republics, but were instead community-based governments operated by the common people themselves — not by a group of elite Senators. Texas was the only state to ever adopt a Roman-style Republic and therefore the only State that could, in theory, be “restored” to being a Republic, and functioning as a completely separate country with its own language, coinage, laws, etc. There are some Texans who cling to that idea and who aspire to rule over Texas as oligarchs—- which is the end result of Roman Republics —-but the fact is that they would lose the support of all the other States of the Union and be viewed as foreign insurrectionists and traitors. Most Texans are not insurrectionists and are not traitors to this country as a whole, nor do they cherish dreams of being “Senators” and lording it over other Texans. Most Texans just want what we all desire— to have the Hired Help back in order and leaving them, the Texans, alone to live their lives without subjection to arbitrary foreign “laws” and coercion imposed by run amok public employees. Is that too much to ask? Without being branded as an insurrectionist? Or a Tin Hat? Or a “Sovereign Citizen”? We believe that all the ignorant talk about “state republics” is being promoted by enemies of this country and that they and their agenda should be avoided — first, because the Roman Republic failed disastrously and oligarchy is always despotic, and second, if these yahoos don’t know enough history and law to decry the idea of “restoring” state republics that never existed, they certainly aren’t competent to restore the actual government we are owed. ---------------------------- See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. By Anna Von Reitz Ever heard the expression, "You can't get there from here." --- meaning that you have to go back and go at something a different way? This happens more often than some people might imagine in places like Scotland and Norway, Alaska and Peru. Short of landing a helicopter on a rock, there are places in this world that you can't access because there isn't even a goat path to access them. Other times, there is a way, but it's just one way in and one way out, so if you miss the crucial connection between "here" and "there" you are stuck going back and finding that very special crossroads, or tramway, or ferry. I have spent a considerable portion of my life in such adventurous places, so when I hear "you can't get there from here" I know what to think ---- and do. I stop. I listen carefully. I check my compass points. So should you. Our Forefathers were faced with some staggeringly formidable challenges, no less daunting than mountain ranges and lochs and fjords. They were, after all, doing something that had never been attempted before --- a government run by the governed. Unlike us, they were familiar with the snakepit of European politics, complete with meddling from the Roman Catholic Church. Also unlike us, they were familiar with the jurisdictional framework of the system of law we had inherited from Britain. They knew the difference between land and soil. Soil is defined as the first six inches of dirt under our feet. It is the thin but inescapable surface where we live and breathe. Land is all the subsoil and rock and magma underlying the soil, the subsurface world where one finds underground rivers and veins of gold and basins of oil. Soil only persists for our purposes where it happens to protrude above the surface of the ocean and provides us with the comforts of air and fresh water, but land connects seamlessly throughout the planet without regard for such niceties. As a result of these practical matters, soil is the unique jurisdiction of nations of people who claim their portion of the inhabitable surface of the land protruding above sea level, otherwise known as the soil, and the land underlying each nation and every ocean remains a vast international dominion that cares little for our political subdivisions. Both land and sea remain venues for international trade because of these considerations, while business conducted on the soil between people and their unincorporated enterprises has a local scope and nature that adheres to local law instead of international law. Thus, even though land and soil are unavoidably and inextricably connected, they operate as two separate jurisdictions and under two very different forms of law. Custom dictates that the law of the soil takes precedence over the law of the land and the sea with respect to living people, and that when people enter the realm of international trade, they act instead as "persons". On the soil we act as living people and stand under law that applies to living people. On land we act as Lawful Persons and at sea we act as Legal Persons, and both stand under international law that applies to "dead" business enterprises of all kinds and simple corporations. What happens when we launch into the foreign jurisdiction of the air and invade the dominion of the birds in flight and leaping flames and beams of light? Well, then, things get even more abstract, and we find incorporated business entities that belong to Third Parties, engaged in commerce, an entire realm of PERSONS engaged in business activities and standing under commercial law (on the land) and maritime law (on the sea). Obviously, with such a system of jurisdictional constructs derived from the natural world, and different forms of law governing activities within each jurisdiction, there is a potential for considerable friction wherever the jurisdictions overlap and butt up against each other. Louis Abercrombie is a living man who naturally stands under the national law of the soil jurisdiction, but his unincorporated family business, Abercrombie and Sons, may engage in international trade and thereby become subject to international law. It may also choose to form a board of directors, elect officers, seek a charter, and morph into Abercrombie and Sons, Inc., and thereby become subject to global commercial and maritime law. We have to determine whether a given activity is taking place on the soil and among the living people, subject to local law, or, is it an action taking place in international jurisdiction among "juridical Persons" and subject to international law, or, is it something taking place between incorporated franchises and commercial corporations, and therefore subject to global commercial and maritime law? The interface between Lawful Persons standing on the land and Legal Persons at sea has always been especially problematic, because they look and sound alike, yet operate in two different dominions. Land Law, as in "The Law of the Land" is a different beastie from The Law of the Sea, yet the Lawful Person of Louis Abercrombie is indistinguishable from the Legal Person of Louis Abercrombie on paper. Is "Louis Abercrombie" a Lawful Person standing under Land Law, claiming his Constitutional Guarantees, or is "Louis Abercrombie" acting as a Legal Person and standing under the Law of the Sea? Louis Abercrombie on the Land can be "unlawfully converted" to Louis Abercrombie on the Sea, and nobody is the wiser until poor Louis comes to a court of law, and like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz. realizes that he's not in Kansas anymore. He's out on the High Seas and the Queen's Officers (or Flying Monkeys, as the case may be) are treating him as a suspicious character at best, quite possibly an Enemy of the State, or even a lunatic. No wonder millions of Americans who have been deliberately misidentified as Legal Persons are disoriented and confused when they are hauled into a foreign Admiralty or Maritime Courts and told that their precious Constitutions --- "the Law of the Land" --- doesn't apply. Well, it doesn't, but only because without his knowing agreement, "Louis Abercrombie", a Lawful Person, has been illegally and immorally latched upon and unlawfully converted into "Louis Abercrombie" a sea-going Legal Person. Compare it to being shanghaied into the French Foreign Legion, or, more exactly, press-ganged into the British Navy. This "unlawful conversion" is precisely what Congressman Louis T. McFadden was complaining about back in 1934 when he protested it in public and brought charges against it to the Judicial Committee of the House of Representatives --- where those charges are still lodged, like a long-buried bomb set to blow Washington, DC, to smithereens. Congressman McFadden was poisoned and the Judicial Committee conveniently has never acted upon his charges. This is also what Frank L. Baum, author of The Wizard of Oz saw happening twenty-five years prior to McFadden's objections, a time when all the Robber Barons were fleeing their misdeeds in international jurisdiction by converting their private corporations like Bethlehem Steel Company into commercial corporations like Bethlehem Steel, Incorporated. They were fleeing the international jurisdiction and vacating it for the jurisdiction of the air, which is comparatively lawless--- and it is also where they could secure the protections of public bankruptcy as public corporations. When they incorporated during their mad rush to gain public bankruptcy protection for their private fortunes as shareholders in their own businesses, the Robber Barons gave away control of those businesses and subjected themselves and their operations to the so-called "public corporations" ostensibly owned by us, the US, INC. and the USA, Inc. and the State of Delaware, Inc., etc., and never noticed that those corporations were owned in turn by the British Crown Corporation and controlled by unincorporated foreign holding companies like "the American Corporations Company" and "Cede and Company". From then on, the Robber Barons had public-sponsored bankruptcy protection, that is, bankruptcy protection purportedly sponsored by us, but they didn't really own their own businesses anymore. Bureaucrats could appear on their doorsteps day or night and tell them what to do, and they had to do it as good little franchisees. The Federal Income Tax "law" of 1916 is a good example. Conceived as a payroll tax on the earnings of Federal Employees for the privilege of their employment contract, it was implemented against the Employers --- not directly against the Employees. It's the "public" corporations that employ these workers that are obligated to collect the tax and withhold it and forward it to the parent corporations --- the US, INC. and USA, Inc. and their State-of-State subsidiaries. They, in turn, pass the loot on to the Pope and the Queen and the Lord Mayor, the owner-operators of the unincorporated holding companies. And they get away with it by pretending that all these storefront corporations belong to us, when we, the rank and file people of this country, had nothing to do with this scheme and never granted authority for any of it, and are left holding the bag every time these reprobates go bankrupt at our expense. Even though press-ganging has been illegal for over 200 years and slavery and peonage have been outlawed worldwide since 1926, these commercial corporations have gone merrily onward and done whatever they pleased without fear of retribution until now, when the nature of their crimes and the mechanisms of their fraud have been dissected and exposed. Now, all of this is very interesting and necessary to understand, but where was I going with this? Oh, yes, to that place I can't get to from here --- America. Our Forefathers (wisely) separated the National jurisdiction of the soil overseen by the living people running their own republican County Governments from the International Jurisdictions (Land and Sea) overseen by the Lawful Persons ("People") overseeing their State Governments. Thus, we have two (2) layers of lawful government in this country, both unincorporated, yet separated from each other because they operate in separate jurisdictions and under separate forms of law. The County Government in the American Government is not a junior franchise of a State-of-State Government, it is instead the fundamental building block and highest authority from which all else ultimately derives. The County Sheriff is the highest-ranking peace officer in this country as a result, and the Common Law of the People, expressed by our Juries, is the highest form of law. The County is where the people live and breathe and make the decisions about what happens in their lives. The State is where the people act as Lawful Persons to determine their course in international affairs. And their State-of-State should be where they act as Legal Person/PERSONS to determine their course in International Trade and in Commerce. Should be. But since the 1860's, our "State of State" entities haven't been run by the American States. They've been run as franchises of British Corporations and Papist Municipal CORPORATIONS instead, which means that we have had little or no control of our economy, our trade policies, our natural resources, or our country. The Queen, the Pope, and the Lord Mayor of the Inner City of London have acted in Gross Breach of Trust and violation of their commercial service contracts with us. This entire house of cards has been built on high-level fraud and abuse of bankruptcy laws, commodity rigging, corporate monopolies, illegal enslavement and peonage, racketeering, extortion, misrepresentation, identity theft, credit hacking based on impersonation, legalised gambling, and war for profit. It has been considerably worse than the Wild West, even though it has been carried out by men wearing tweed suits. Where does all this corruption leave us, Joe and Jane American? Legally, it leaves us misidentified as British Territorial U.S. Citizens as if we were all born in Puerto Rico, and "lost on the High Seas" before we left grade school. And that is where we wake up to all this crime and corruption against us --- the High Seas jurisdiction of Maritime Law, presumed to be voluntarily acting as Municipal citizens of the United States and as incorporated franchises of the UNITED STATES, INC., currently doing business as franchises of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electrical Utility: JOHN Q. PUBLIC. We can overcome that presumption by changing our NAME back to a Proper Name like John Q. Public, however, this name and identity has also been stolen and is thought to represent a British Territorial U.S. Citizen and the copyright to his Proper Name as a Legal Person is owned by the British Crown Corporation. And we can't escape that "legal presumption" by changing our name, unless we forsake our birthright and the name our parents gave us, because --- remember --- the name of our Lawful Person on the Land appears to be the same as the name of our Legal Person on the High Seas and Navigable Inland Waterways. Our parents never recorded our birth on the land, didn't know they had to do that, unless by chance they published a Birth Announcement in the local newspaper. So the Brits came along and copyrighted our Proper Names as franchisees of the British Crown Corp and they have used that "ownership interest" as their excuse for everything else they've done here. What to do? We correct this "mistake" on their parts and draw a line between our Lawful Person and the British Territorial Legal Person by establishing our "standing" on the land.. After all, we actually owned and used our Proper Name, which was a creation and gift to us bestowed by our parents, before the Brits claimed any ownership interest in it. They didn't buy it from us or provide us any equitable payment in consideration of the theft of our identity and political status and personal estate--- so by international Law of the Sea, possession by pirates does not change ownership. All we need to do is record and publish our ownership interest via a Land Recording Office or other public venue, such as the local newspapers, and re-convey our Good Name back to the Land Jurisdiction of this country. But now we get down to the final point of all this: you can't leap directly to the soil jurisdiction from the jurisdiction of the High Seas. You can't get there from here pertains to this situation. You have to retrace the pathway from the Municipal Maritime Jurisdiction to the British Territorial High Seas to the Land Jurisdiction of this country (State) to the soil jurisdiction of your County. And then, you are finally and totally home again, an American in America, ready to go chin to chin. Knowing all of this, knowing how it works, we chose to "repopulate" our States of the Union first, because we connected international sea to international land, and then connected international land to national soil. Step by logical step, as is necessary. Once people declare, record, and publish their identity and political status and standing --- on the Land of their State of the Union, they are automatically placed within the County where they live and come home to where they belong in sum total. There is no need to fight to take back the over 3,000 counties and then take back the 50 States. Our States and Counties never went anywhere. They aren't lost. There is nothing to fight over. Our national jurisdiction still stands as long as we do. Each one of us was commandeered and shanghaied, so that our institutions of government were left vacant and "presumed to be in interregnum" for over 160 years, and our credit and our country have both been abused by foreign employees subjecting us to their own foreign laws and evading their constitutional obligations. There are those running around like chickens in a poultry yard, squawking and preaching "revolution" and setting up phony "republics" that have no standing in law and no historical provenance. Many of these people are sincerely confused and some are agent provocateurs trying to give the Brits an excuse to come in here, claim "insurrection" and (openly) enforce martial law. It's important to remember that they have been operating under martial law since 1789 and have been fraudulently occupying our entire country under martial law since 1860. We, Americans, are owed The Law of Peace and protection as we come back home and take up the responsibilities of self-governance. Alone among all the various patriot groups and efforts, The American States Assembly has discerned the history and the law, and chosen the narrow and difficult path that is the only way home. Now, we undertake the even more daunting responsibilities of Self-Governance. If you have felt that you were in a strange and foreign land where nothing makes sense any more --- you are right. Our British and Municipal Subcontractors have trafficked us into foreign jurisdictions and subjected us to their own foreign forms of law, evaded their duties under our Constitutional contracts with them, and engaged in illegal armed racketeering on our shores. We have been in The Land of Oz. But now it is time to wake up, shake off the dust, and come home. Every asset that these Pikers have used as collateral for their debts belongs to us, and so does all the credit that they raised by "securitizing" and "monetizing" everything in sight. And Kansas, Dorothy, tornadoes and all, still belongs to us. ---------------------------- See this article and over 3800 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. What Actually Drives the De-Population Agenda By Anna Von Reitz It’s not what you think. It never is. The Sons of the Devil are constitutionally unable to tell the truth about anything. So they weasel around spinning tales about climate change they engineer using advanced geo-engineering they keep hidden from the public they are supposed to serve. And then they use this phony self-created “climate change” as an excuse to levy new and ever-more oppressive taxes and claim ever-more coercive control over every aspect of life. Left to them, our cows would wear diapers and gasoline would cost $100 a gallon, and it would all be nothing but a commodity rigging scheme to guarantee maximum profits for minimum product to the oil companies. Think about it. What would EXXON prefer? Selling a hundred gallons at a buck a gallon, or one gallon for a hundred bucks? See now what Joe and Hunter Biden are actually doing and who they are doing it for? Same old crappola, same players, same motives. Solomon was right. Nothing changes until we change ourselves. Until we wake up and wise up we will continue to be the goats for these “special interests”. Burisma, the shutdown of Nordstream, all of it is one big pile of deliberate commodity rigging to squeeze the last penny out of consumers who are helplessly dependent on gas and oil. And the double-speaking sanctimonious hypocrites are doing this under the guise of saving the environment in the name of Big Oil. LOL. And all your billions going to Ukraine are just propping up this same scheme. Certain facts remain, folks. Oil companies are always going to soak you if they can. Doctors don’t make profits off of healthy people. Mercenaries don’t make money off of peace. And the government — what government there is —- makes its money off of lying to you and scaring you. Most of you have heard about Med Beds and all the new medical tech just waiting to be released, cures for cancer, regeneration therapy, and so on. Have you thought beyond the superficial facts to what it means if we all turn the clock back by thirty years? That’s right, Jethro. It means that a whole lot of other people have to die and still more can never be born. The elites are right now making sure that all the old, the already sick, the very young, the mentally incompetent — all those “useless eaters” — bite the dust. Their immune systems are being compromised so that they die from all sorts of different causes but they die in ever greater numbers. 44% more deaths overall and climbing— to date. And that, dear hearts, is what is going on. There’s the in-crowd “destined” to live “forever” and the out-crowd destined to die of artificially induced immune suppression. There is a reason that Dr. Fauci, the leading expert in AIDS research, was put in charge of this. Homosexuals were not effective enough as agents to carry and spread the AIDS epidemic throughout the General Population. So the Vermin had to come up with a way to infect more people without alarming the herd. It’s always easier to kill people if they think you are saving them, instead. They will all line up like good little cows and volunteer. Lord Pirbright learned that in Africa many years ago in the world’s first Concentration Camps. Having been shamed, guilted, misinformed and importuned under color of law, the victims can always be blamed because they volunteered. Wake up, World. Smell the carnage. They are clearing the stage for the next Act. There is a reason that otherwise sane people are buying into the hype and nonsense of the UN Depopulation Agenda, even though current numbers prove that we are in the midst of a natural population collapse in all the industrialized nations worldwide. Quite simply, the Perps are motivated by the idea that they are part of the Chosen few who are going to live eternal charmed lives at the expense of all those silently condemned to die. As most of them have lived egocentric lives of unearned privilege, this narrative sounds good to them. ---------------------------- See this article and over 3700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. By Anna Von Reitz You know I love Clif High— but, like all of us, he makes mistakes from time to time, especially when the material under consideration is deliberately confusing and a bit off his beaten path. That’s my evaluation of his recent thought piece called “Narradigm”. There are profound differences between The United States —- unincorporated, The United States, Inc., the United States, and the United States, Inc, and the United States, INC. I get confused sometimes and I have been threading through this stuff for going on fifty years, so….. no wonder that people get constantly confused by the word maze, even very astute and intelligent people. That said there are some things that I would like to bring forward and stomp on so that they can be put to rest before they cause more confusion and damage. The first is the simple observation that our country has never been bankrupt. Only corporations are eligible for bankruptcy protection so any time someone starts talking about bankruptcy you know that they are talking about a corporation and not a nation, not a country. If everyone knew that little tidbit we could do away with half the confusion and set aside the idea that our country is bankrupt when in fact we are talking about the bankruptcy of a foreign corporation that is bankrupt and doesn’t deserve bankruptcy protection —- but that’s another topic, isn’t it? And even that foreign bankrupt corporation wasn’t formed in 1871. That’s another blind alley. In 1868 the British Territorial Government formed a commercial corporation in Scotland and called it “The United States of America, Incorporated”. This is the Scottish Doppelgänger that impersonated our Federation of States and hacked into our credit after the Civil War. A few years later, 1871, the Pope’s Municipal Government attempted to follow suit, but the legislation was shot down and the Act of 1871 was repealed in 1874. They did eventually incorporate a commercial corporation called “the” United States, Inc., and the Muni Government has incorporated a vast plethora of official-sounding corporations ever since, but the Act of 1871 was stillborn. It stands as proof of intent to defraud and change the nature of the Parties to the Constitutional contracts — mostly to secure bankruptcy protection for the foreign shareholders— but the Act of 1871 didn’t go anywhere. It would take another seven years — 1878, before they accomplished, in a piecemeal fashion, parts of what they hoped to do in 1871. So everyone can stop beating the Act of 1871 like a dead horse and move on to study what brought us to the famous moment in 2015 when Mr. Obama bankrupted the UNITED STATES, Inc. They have been trying to impersonate living Americans as franchises of a bankrupt Puerto Rican Electric Utility ever since. Some people really do believe in magic. Another point I want to stomp dead— the idea that we, Americans, are subject to The Law of War. It’s true that the U.S. Army has occupied this country — illegally—since 1863, but that does not mean that their Employers and Allies are subject to The Law of War. The “Enemy” back then and ever since is the foreign population of Municipal citizens of the United States. Just imagine the U.S. Army putting down the Federal Civil Service for insurrection and you will have a far more accurate picture of what has gone on here. The two foreign Federal Subcontractors have been fighting each other for over a century and a half—- at least, on paper, but as for their American Employers, we were contractually held harmless by President Andrew Johnson and that has never changed. It couldn’t change because, once again, they had to legalize their illegal actions by providing contractual remedy. As a result, Americans are owed The Law of Peace, not The Law of War. The problem has been that the American people were left in the dark about all this while our public employees operated under a cloak of secrecy to feather their nests, usurp upon our lawful government, and defraud their actual employers in Gross Breach of Trust. Because we were never told any of this history, we didn’t know that our lawful government had yet to be Reconstructed. And we didn’t know that we were being misrepresented “as if” we were both U.S. Citizens and Municipal citizens of the United States when in fact we are neither. We are simply Americans, members of the General Public, who never participated in the Civil War at all. Now that the facts have been laid bare, we have taken the appropriate and determined action to identify ourselves and record and publish our political status and correct our run amok foreign subcontractors. As the “federal” subcontractors are all foreign commercial corporations, we occupy a completely different jurisdiction and stand apart on the land and soil of this country. And we are not subject to our employees either in war or at peace. Finally, I wish to drum home the fact that the so-called “American Civil War” wasn’t actually a war, so technically no Law of War could ever apply to members of the General Public. Congress never declared any such war and no formal peace treaty ended it. The Muster Rolls show that all the soldiery fought as mercenaries employed by foreign commercial corporations that were under contract to provide us with “good faith” service. The American Civil War was fraudulently misrepresented to the Public from the start and it all remains steeped in illegality, lawlessness, breach of trust, and fraud to this day. Mr. Lincoln was not our American President. He was not a valid Commander in Chief. He had no authority to issue Executive Orders except to his own employees. And most especially, he had no “Emergency Powers” allowing him to set aside one jot of any Constitution owed to Americans and substitute the Lieber Code, aka, Hague Conventions, instead. Now that you know what the actual problem is and know how and by whom you have been abused and defrauded you can’t “unknow” it. Every American reading this must get up on their hind legs and make tracks to object to this ongoing fraud and illegal mercenary warfare taking place on our shores. Every American reading this, especially those who have sworn to protect the Constitutions our actual Government and People are owed, must take action. The proper peaceful and lawful action is to join your State Assembly which is already in Session and exercise your guaranteed right to Self-Govern. Those things occupying Washington, DC, are nothing but foreign commercial corporations in the business of providing “essential government services”. It’s time that they and the foreign Principals responsible for their existence and run amok operations were made aware of their contractual obligations. Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.net and get going today. ---------------------------- See this article and over 3700 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com To support this work look for the Donate button on this website. How do we use your donations? Find out here. |
AuthorAnna Von Reitz Archives
December 2022
Categories |